Talk:Albruna

A fact from Albruna appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 December 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Albruna may have been the woman of "superhuman size" who stopped Roman general Drusus's campaign in Germania by prophesying his death?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Albruna.

Wikipedia

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirituality Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Religion Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wrong date

Tacitus wrote in the 1st century AD, so she cannot be from the 2nd century AD.--Hyphantes (talk) 01:16, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Hyphantes. We need more from [1] Dougweller (talk) 09:25, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question

How can Gilbert Trathnigg's etymology be different from Schramm's?--Berig (talk) 20:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 01:36, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Albruna, a possible Germanic pagan priestess, may haunt modern scholarship as a "ghost name"?
- ALT1: ... that Albruna may have scared the Roman general Drusus so much that he turned back with his legions and soon died?
- ALT2: ... that it is not known whether Albruna was a pagan Germanic priestess or a goddess?
- ALT3: ... that it is not known whether Albruna was her correct name, or a misunderstanding?

5x expanded by Berig (talk). Self-nominated at 14:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Comment (not a review): I started looking at this, but realised I am very much not familiar with this area and don't feel entirely confident undertaking a review. I do like the hooks and it's an intriguing subject for an article! I wanted to flag the following comments, in case they are helpful (please ignore if not!):

I don't quite follow this sentence in the lead: "Moreover, it is still pointed out that the emendation Albruna agrees with the names of other Germanic wise women."
Should "instriptions" (before the Drusus heading) be "inscriptions"?
Should the names of scholars be wikilinked, where there is a page for the author (e.g. Simek)?
What does mss mean, and could this be explained when it is first referenced?
The second paragraph of the Aurinia section has two sentences starting with "However" in a row, which is a bit awkward to read.

Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 02:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chocmilk03, thank you! Very good feedback! I have changed the text per your suggestions, and I hope that you find the text in the lead improved.–Berig (talk) 11:18, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm also not conducting a review at this time, but I just wanted to comment on the QPQ requirement. @Berig:, are you aware of the QPQ requirement in WP:DYKCRIT (specifically, #5)? I see that as of two days ago, you just reached five DYK credits, so it appears that you are no longer exempt. Are you intending to conduct a DYK review soon? Feel free to reach out if you need help or advice. Edge3 (talk) 01:06, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have been vaguely aware of it, and a few days ago, I had a try at my first review: Template:Did you know nominations/Elizabeth Reiter.―Berig (talk) 09:37, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full review needed now that a QPQ has been supplied. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:38, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to meet 5x requirements (from 396 words to 2394 words of readable text, 2453 characters up to 14,432 all during period of 7 days prior to nom), long enough, seems neutral and reasonably sourced. Earwig says 0.0, QPQ met. Of the four proposed hooks, I'm not seeing any problems with ALT1 but the other hooks, being somewhat nebulous seem to have somewhat nebulous sourcing. I can't help but think we have a punchier hook somewhere here. BusterD (talk) 08:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: how about
- ALT4: "...that Roman general Drusus's campaign in Germania was halted by Albruna, a woman of “superhuman size,” who spoke to him in his own language and prophesied his death?" Ideas, User:Berig? BusterD (talk) 19:43, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - ALT4a: ...that Albruna may have been the woman of "superhuman size" who stopped the Roman general Drusus's campaign in Germania by prophesying his death?―Berig (talk) 20:26, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - I'm thinking the word "may" will be a click killer, while more accurate. Are we on the right track at least? BusterD (talk) 20:38, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      - ALT4b: " ...that Albruna may have been the woman of "superhuman size" who stopped Roman general Drusus's campaign in Germania by prophesying his death?
      - ALT4c: " ...that Albruna may be the name of a barbarian woman of "superhuman size" who stopped Roman general Drusus's campaign in Germania by prophesying his death? BusterD (talk) 20:48, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree!—Berig (talk) 20:50, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So we agree on ALT4c? IMHO the usage of "may" in this alt makes the claim sound more mysterious as opposed to properly qualifing the statement. BusterD (talk) 20:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just chiming here to say I prefer ALT4b, as being a bit more concise & easy to follow; 4c is trying to pack slightly too much in IMO. Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 21:04, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am fine with both. We should probably go with ALT4b, as Chocmilk03 suggests.—Berig (talk) 21:26, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good to go with ALT4b. Meets all review criteria. Wish we had an image, but we don't. BusterD (talk) 21:46, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Berig: could you make sure everything in ALT4b is cited inline at the end of the relevant sentences before I promote? Also, I'm missing where it says that Albruna prophesied the general's death... theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she?) 08:15, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Theleekycauldron, you find everything referenced in the section Drusus. As for the prophesying of Drusus' death it is in the more detailed account of the prophecy in the extract from Cassius Dio "But depart ; for the end alike of thy labours and of thy life is already at hand." (Cary's translation). Please, tell me if you need more.–Berig (talk) 09:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ALT4b to T:DYK/P6