Talk:Albrecht Kossel

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 5, 2018.

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the field of physiology.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Close paraphrasing

Article seems to have texted lifted from this oft-cited source, as shown by the duplication detector report. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:50, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the report and all instances look ok to my inexperienced eyes. The source and the article are, after all, about the same subject.Jarhed (talk) 22:00, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The citation is indeed an excellent one and this article is shot through with references to it.Jarhed (talk) 22:02, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's not quite set in stone, but stuff like "young their son walther was born in 1888 and their daughter gertrude in 1889" (which is in both texts) should be rephrased, perhaps "... young. Walther, their son, was born in 1888, followed in 1889 by their daughter Gertrude." Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:30, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I made this plus some other changes, please review.Jarhed (talk) 04:17, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After fixing the reported issues and no further review, I removed the template.Jarhed (talk) 22:53, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]