Jump to content

Talk:Albert T. Robles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Albert T. Robles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Water district?

[edit]

This article claimed that the subject also served on the water district board in Carson, California — however, there's a different Albert Robles who is described as the current mayor of Carson, and also previously served on the water district board, and their biographical details are different enough that they don't appear to be the same person. The source for the water district claims was, further, a dead link, so it was impossible for me to verify whether this Albert Robles served on the water district board in Carson alongside the other one, or whether somebody mistakenly conflated two different people who merely happened to have the same name. Accordingly I've removed the claim from this article for the time being. It can certainly be readded if somebody can find an updated source which verifies that it's true, but as things stand right now it looks more like a "two different people" merging error than anything else. Bearcat (talk) 17:31, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]