Jump to content

Talk:Albert A. Murphree

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAlbert A. Murphree has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 6, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
February 15, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Additional information needed

[edit]

1. Need to identify specific accomplishments from Murphree's time as president of West Florida Seminary / Florida State College / Florida State Female College / Florida State College for Women.

2. What were his policies and specific accomplishments as president of WFS/FSC/FSFC/FSCW?

3. Need citation authority for the Murphree statue on the FSU campus.

4. Need a good digital or digitized photo of the statue of FSU statue.

Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:55, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Albert A. Murphree/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

A few comments:

  • The lede should either be all referenced, or without references.
 Done I have moved the substantive reference from the lede to the third footnote. The first two footnotes remaining in the lede are not citations, but are explanatory footnotes regarding the confusing succession of names of Florida State University and the University of Florida. These explanations need to be included, but they seem most appropriately provided in explanatory notes rather than the body text. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:25, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The portrait is of rather low quality; I can look into editing it a bit, but I think the best bet would be finding a new image if possible.
Agreed. It is the best contemporaneous photo available, but I am in contact with the university historian and see if the university will unconditionally release a head shot to be released to WikiCommons. Hopefully, they will. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:25, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
With a new image hopefully coming in soon, it's not an issue for this review. Hope your correspondence works out! Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 03:10, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The first two references could be shortened, the prose content converted into notes, which might be more efficient in formatting them.
Hmm. Rather than creating a new "Notes" section, I would ask to keep these two explanatory notes regarding the evolution of the two universities' names as explanatory in-line footnotes. Any problem with that? Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:25, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 03:10, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think, and this may just be my browser, that the lowest image is pushing the references to the side of the page, making the formatting awkward. Try moving it up a bit?
Not quite sure what to do here, because I cannot see what you're seeing. I have placed the auditorium photo to either break the "See also" tool line on a wide monitor (good layout to break long section lines) or remain completely above the tool line on a narrow monitor. If you want to take a crack at moving the photo to get better placement results across a range of monitor sizes, please do. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:25, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have moved the image up, which makes the references fill the entire page. It looks much better, and is less of an issue. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 03:10, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • An ISBN for all the books in the Bibliography would be nice if possible.
 Done All available ISBNs are already included. Of course, the 1928 book is pre-ISBNS, the unpublished manuscript does not have one, and the 1853-2003 anniversary book oddly does not seem to have an ISBN, either. Maybe because it was published by the university and was not offered for sale. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:25, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 03:10, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's all I can see after an initial reading. Reviewer: Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 22:44, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sir, for your review, comments and suggestions. Please let me know if you have any other changes. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:25, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not a problem. Thanks for writing a great article. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 03:10, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albert A. Murphree - FSU.JPG Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Albert A. Murphree - FSU.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:31, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MurphreeStatue.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:MurphreeStatue.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:11, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Albert A. Murphree. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:36, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]