Talk:Albania in the Eurovision Song Contest 2013/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 17:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will start my review of this tonight or tomorrow; however, you need to fix the nomination template for the other song contest participation of Albania since it is currently displaying the review as unknown on the music GANs page. --K. Peake 17:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Infobox looks good!
Target Radio Televizioni Shqiptar to RTSH
"and a live performance in the Netherlands." → "and a live performance, the latter of which was in the Netherlands."
"to qualify to for the final" → "to qualify for the final" with the target

Iaof2017 You have not removed the excess word from here. --K. Peake 15:08, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iaof2017 "to qualify to for the final" is still the wording – fix this. --K. Peake 15:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake Done--Lorik17 (talk) 16:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Either add one or more sentences to the second para or make the lead only one para, as the last para is much too short right now

Background

"finishing in the seventh place," → "and finished in the seventh place,"

Before Eurovision

Festivali i Këngës

Shouldn't the img be aligned to the left since the succeeding one is on the right?

Iaof2017 This works fine, doesn't it? --K. Peake 15:08, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake I think its appropriate as it is because there is enough space between both images but if you don't agree with it I can change it.--Lorik17 (talk) 15:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Images usually have different alignments for multiple appearances, but this is not a GA requirement so it can remain. --K. Peake 15:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target Radio Televizioni Shqiptar to RTSH
"on 22 December 2012 held at the" → "on 22 December 2012, being held at the" to specify the entire competition was held at the venue
"to participate in the competition," → "to participate in Festivali i Këngës,"
"being shortlisted to" → "with them being shortlisted to"
"On 30 November," → "On 30 November 2012,"

Competing entries

Table is missing the appropriate source(s)

Shows

Semi-finals

"In it, the shows featured guest performances by" → "During the semi-finals, guest performances were featured from"

Final

"emerged as the winner and were simultaneously announced as the country's" → "emerged as the winning artists and were simultaneously announced as Albania's"

Promotion

"premiered via the Eurovision Song Contest's official YouTube channel of the Eurovision Song Contest on" → "premiered via the official YouTube channel of the Eurovision Song Contest on"

At Eurovision

It is not mentioned anywhere by the source that the draw was held at the Malmö City Hall, even though the remainder of the sentence is backed up
"for the 2013 contest" → "for the contest"
"among the top 10 entries in the second semi-final" → "among the top 10 entries" since we already know it is an entry in the second semi-final
Target final to Eurovision Song Contest 2013#Final
"in the contest." → "in the Eurovision Song Contest."
The last sentence is completely unsourced

Voting

All of the points at which you write "the first semi-final" are inaccurate; the country competed in the second semi-final
"by the country on" → "by the country for"
"the country finished in" → "Albania finished in"
"In the final, Albania awarded its 12 points to Macedonia in the semi-final," → "Albania awarded its 12 points to Macedonia in the second semi-final,"

Points awarded to Albania

Good

Points awarded by Albania

Notes

Good

References

Copyvio score looks decent at 35.1%
Top job on the archiving here!
Wikilink European Broadcasting Union on ref 1

External links

Good

Final comments and verdict

On hold until all of the issues are fixed, but I particularly noticed you have improved in terms of ref layout; good luck with the article though! --K. Peake 09:19, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake Thanks for the review, I followed your comments. :)--Lorik17 (talk) 14:41, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iaof2017 ✓ Pass now after you fixed that one last query! --K. Peake 16:16, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]