Talk:Albania in the Eurovision Song Contest 2009/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 17:21, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will take this on now while it is the most recent GAN under other music articles; will start either today or tomorrow! --K. Peake 17:21, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Infobox looks good!
"of the Eurovision Song Contest," → "of the contest,"

Background

Good

Before Eurovision

Festivali i Këngës

Add the main article template at the top to wikilink Festivali i Këngës 47

Competing entries

Target West Side Family to Dr. Flori and remove the wikilink on him under composer(s) in this context

Shows

Semi-finals

"they performed a duet with other Albanian artists." → "each artist performed a duet with an other Albanian artist."
Target West Side Family to Dr. Flori
Target Getoar Selimi to Tingulli 3nt

Final

Target West Side Family to Dr. Flori

At Eurovision

Reword the img text to be of relevance to this article plus write her full name on the text
Target second to Eurovision Song Contest 2009#Semi-final 2
"for the 2009 contest" → "for the Eurovision Song Contest 2009"
"of the 42 participating countries of the contest" → "of the 42 participating countries"

Voting

"the nation finished in" → "Albania finished in"
"including 10 awarded from" → "including 10 from"

Points awarded to Albania

Good

Points awarded by Albania

Good

Split voting results

Good

References

Copyvio score looks amazing at 13.8!!!
Great job on archiving them all once again and there is no issues with the layout at all!

Final comments and verdict

On hold until all of the issues are fixed, hopefully this can be another article of yours that is passed in the same day as the review! --K. Peake 19:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kyle Peake, thanks for another great review. I have done all your suggestions. Best regards!--Lorik17 (talk) 20:11, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lorik17 ✓ Pass now, thanks to you straight back for a great response! --K. Peake 21:11, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]