Jump to content

Talk:Caucasian Albania (Sasanian province)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Albania (satrapy))

Tag is unjustified

[edit]

Tag is unjustified. Please show what is OR and unverified. Iranica is cited as a source throughout this article. YOu havent even discussed the issue one bit and you went ahead to put up a tag?Azerbaijani 13:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added some sources and removed the OR tag, as I left a comment above a long time ago and got no response.Hajji Piruz 17:14, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can you show me any source that calls Albania a satrapy? You called the article Albania (satrapy), but I have not seen any source refering to Albania using this particular word. Grandmaster 04:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Satrapy means province in old. We could also, instead of "satrapy" use "shahr" or "shahrab" if you prefer, they both mean the same thing (both mean province).Hajji Piruz 15:03, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Josef Wiesehofer, to whom you refer, says that Albania was not shahr, but that it was a kingdom. Grandmaster 12:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reinserted the Iranica sourced information that was removed. Also, the information that you replaced that Iranica sourced information is about Barda after the Arab invasions, which is completely irrelevant to this article.Hajji Piruz 14:49, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

[edit]

This should be merged with the Caucasian Albania article, since it is the same. --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@HistoryofIran:, I concur strongly. - LouisAragon (talk) 03:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
After looking at a few sources, it seems like besides the Caucasian Albania kingdom itself, the Sasanians also had a province named Arran/Ardan (Albania). --HistoryofIran (talk) 16:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Albania (satrapy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Albania (satrapy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]