Talk:Alavijeh

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of Alavijeh be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Iran may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Alavijeh

Hi The name of this city is Alavijeh, but someone changed it to Alaviche. Please review and correct this item. Thanks Amsh94 (talk) 07:35, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alavijeh

Hi I talked about Alavijeh's name, but nothing has changed Please check.

The name of the city should be changed to Alavijeh Thankful — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amsh94 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing errors

For the second time, I've corrrected a referencing error introduced to the article by Kamran.h20320. The edit adds an invocation of a named reference after the {{references}} template, which causes a spurious footnote to appear and adds a referencing error at the bottom of the article. The fix doesn't remove any content or references from the article, so this kind of edit shouldn't be controversial. -- Mikeblas (talk) 21:13, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]