Jump to content

Talk:Alamodome

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New Attendance Record

[edit]

There is a new attendance record, here is one source for this: http://www.sbrforum.com/Recaps/NCAAF/20071229NCAAFTEXASAM---0.aspx Anyone care to edit this in? 12.193.185.2 (talk) 07:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Feel free to fix it up some more. Kuru talk 14:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If the Texas A&M and Penn State game holds the current Alamo Bowl attendance record then why mention the Texas and Iowa game that previously held the record? Maybe on a page for the Alamo Bowl, but why the Alamodome? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.50.227.12 (talk) 01:27, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The acoustics

[edit]

I saw the Rolling Stones there back in the 90's, and the acoustics were horrible: i was at mid distance from the stage, and all i heard was a cacophony of the music from the stage mixed with the (delayed) echo from the back. I was quite upset with the Stones for playing there and charging us for it.

Now the article has it that "the audio system" was upgraded in 2007 (i'm not sure that music acts use the in-house for-sports-events audio system). So, are the acoustics better now ? Because i ain't gone back to that place since. --Jerome Potts (talk) 12:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Costs/constuction history

[edit]

How much did the Alamodome cost to build? How much of that was paid for by taxpayers, and how much by private individuals? If San Antonio is discussing luring a new NFL franchise with new or renovated stadiums, this information would be welcome. Ben (talk) 15:27, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As noted in the article, the final tab was $186.3m. This was largely funded by a voter-approved 1/2 cent sales tax increase, if i recall correctly. The dome was paid off shortly after opening; not sure if the sales tax was ever reduced or simply re-allocated for other purposes. Kuru (talk) 17:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alamodome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alamodome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:48, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Alamodome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Capacity

[edit]

I find it rather odd that the smaller the playing area needed, the smaller the "regular" capacity.

Shouldn't the opposite be true?

Or am I missing something?

Very curious. 2600:8800:785:2A00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 05:44, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Using basketball as an example, they only utilize half of the stadium - they dropped a curtain to block off the unused half. Kuru (talk) 10:59, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alamodome&oldid=1204656855"