Talk:Alabama language

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of the Americas Low‑importance

	Indigenous peoples of the Americas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is this article for real?

Any article that uses the phrase "known in the colonies as" without specifying which empire/nation is unlikely to be serious. Since this article uses that phrase, I am wondering if anything here is true? Or perhaps it is someone's attempt to be funny, IDK. What I DO know is that such a phrase is profoundly OFFENSIVE, and almost certainly intentionally so.216.96.76.79 (talk) 17:08, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but you are wrong. That is not an attempt at causing offense, and you honestly just come off as picky here. Considering the context, if you know anything about the "French and Indian War" and United States history, it should be obvious that the colonies in reference are the British colonies which preceded the formation of the United States of America. See Thirteen Colonies. Dustin (talk) 15:22, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's true that the term "the colonies", without specifying nation, is colloquial UK English for the U.S. It's well-known, but it is colloquial, just as they refer to Europe as "the Continent", like there was only one or something, or the only point of view for an English-speaker is based in Britain. "The Colonies", in reference to the modern U.S. is certainly condescending (and some of my British friends have admitted that it's intended to be) and borderline offensive. Nobody is being nitpicky. The reader might understand which "colonies" are being referred to based on the context, but this is an encyclopedia article; the reader shouldn't have to read into the context. Referring to "the Colonies" would be fine if it linked to the appropriate article. But it's not necessary. We're talking about events that happened in North America, and there is no reason to use European terms or events, and then put them back into a North American context. - Boneyard90 (talk) 07:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Alabama language/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Bit more than a stub. But still only a stub; needs expansion, examples --Skookum1 (8 May 06)

Has a language box. Isn't any more than a stub. --Miskwito (talk) 23:23, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 23:23, 26 April 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 06:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alabama language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070127162721/http://www.alabama-coushatta.com:80/ to http://www.alabama-coushatta.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:00, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alabama language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.alabama-coushatta.com/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060110215130/http://hello-oklahoma.benjaminbruce.us/alabama.htm to http://hello-oklahoma.benjaminbruce.us/alabama.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Alabama language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:38, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]