This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Quick question. Mithun (1999) and Campbell (1997) (presumably basing their statements off Swanton) both say that Akokisa was a dialect of Atakapa, and make no mention of any suggestions otherwise. Where does the idea that "there is no clear evidence that this document actually represents the language of Akokisa" come from? --Miskwito23:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Akokisa/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
I have rated this article for WP:IPNA to start class for the following reasons:
Content. There is a lack of content. The article should be longer.
Citation. There is no inline citation for the references used. See WP:CITE
Infobox. It needs one.
Picture. The picture barely applies. I'd get a new one, zoom it out a bit, and highlight the area where they lived, rather than simply using a map of the San Jacinto watershed.
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
