Jump to content

Talk:Akodon spegazzinii

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleAkodon spegazzinii is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 26, 2017.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 6, 2011Good article nomineeListed
April 3, 2011Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 11, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that because the rodent Akodon spegazzinii is so variable, several populations have been named as separate species?
Current status: Featured article
[edit]

Carlos Luigi Spegazzini. Sasata (talk) 20:20, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. C. Spegazzini, the well-known fungologist of La Plata. I love the species a little more for that. Thomas also says that it's more like Oryzomys than Akodon in some respects; I also love it a little more for that. I'll include a link to Dr. Spegazzini when (if) I expand the article further. Ucucha 21:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Size?

[edit]

Just a bit of vagueness. The article twice says that this species is intermediate in size for the group ... but never actually says what size they are. CarlFink (talk) 14:01, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are measurements at the end of "Description". I had intended to add some to the lead, but forgot to; those have been added now. Ucucha 14:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Akodon spegazzinii/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk) 21:48, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status and should have the full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 21:48, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking up the review; I'm looking forward to your comments. Ucucha 21:53, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    • Taxonomy, first paragraph, "an additional species" used twice in two sentences. A bit redundant...
    • Changed one.
    • The lead says "yellowish to reddish." while the Description section says "reddish to yellowish brown." First, this should probably be made consistent. Second, is this reddish-brown to yellowish-brown or reddish-red to yellowish-brown?
    • Inserted "brown" in lead.
    • Distribution and ecology, "from a latest Pleistocene (Lujanian) paleontological site". What is "a latest...site"?
    • It's a site from the youngest (i.e., latest, most recent) Pleistocene; now hopefully clarified.
    • Distribution and ecology, "dominant species of sigmodontine rodent." Link sigmodontine?
    • Sigmodontinae is already linked some way up, but I don't see any problem with re-linking it here.
    • Conservation status, "However, both Akodon oenos and Akodon leucolimnaeus are listed as "Data Deficient" with a trend of declining populations; they are said to be threatened by agricultural development." If A. oenos and A. leucolimnaeus are the same species as A. spegazzinii, then how is it that they have different IUCN designations?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Read up to Description section, will finish up the review in a bit. Looking good so far. Dana boomer (talk) 22:13, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now finished. Overall a nice article. A few minor prose issues, so putting the article on hold to allow time to deal with these. Dana boomer (talk) 22:57, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick response! The changes look good, so I'm passing the article. As a final comment, it might be worth making it explicit that the IUCN Red List was created before the most recent taxonomic revisions, but that's really up to you. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 01:56, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Since none of the sources explicitly mention this, I'd prefer to leave it implied. Ucucha 13:44, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Akodon spegazzinii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Akodon spegazzinii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:38, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What's it look like?

[edit]

How about including a picture/photo of the rodent? I know there are lots of pic/photos on the internet. I just don't know the copyright or fair use status of them. At least one should be usable. Just a thought. 2600:8800:787:F500:C23F:D5FF:FEC5:89B6 (talk) 06:55, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree with this. I'd add: A featured article about an non-extinct animal without a photo is embarrassing. 2604:6000:100E:C1D2:81CA:3B98:4F32:3757 (talk) 23:11, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not just non-extinct, but described as "widely distributed and common". The GA review above: (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales). So where are they? Davidships (talk) 22:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Akodon spegazzinii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Akodon spegazzinii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:04, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Akodon_spegazzinii&oldid=1198246202"