Talk:Akku Yadav/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Psiĥedelisto (talk · contribs) 13:28, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

I will be reviewing this article. So far it seems GA-quality to me, but I'd like to ask you though to email me the pages you used of the print source Stackhouse (2007) for verifiability. Is that okay with you, Statik N? Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 13:28, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Psiĥedelisto what source? is it a book i cited? also i can't use my email for privacy reasons Statik N (talk) 02:14, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Statik N: The source is, as mentioned, Stackhouse (2007). Cite note 4 as of revision 966223753. If email doesn't work for you, what would? Twitter DM? Discord? I suppose you may also simply upload to Imgur as only one page is cited, page 120. For future reference you can make a ProtonMail e-mail for free and without providing your real name. It may require a phone number, last I knew it did not, but if it does, that would only be given to ProtonMail, I wouldn't see it. Best, Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 02:38, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Psiĥedelisto I sadly can't find the pdf i read it on. Statik N (talk) 02:49, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Statik N: This is quite a problem, because before asking you, I searched it on Google Books.[1] It says, No results found in this book for Yadav.

I want to be sure this isn't a WP:FICTREF. I'm not accusing you of anything—I don't think it is. But, I want to be sure, before I pass your article. Best, Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 02:57, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Psiĥedelisto: here it is https://books.google.com/books?id=Pb0w12-0nY0C&pg=PA120&lpg=PA120&dq=%22anjana+bai+borkar%22+%22Akku+yadav%22&source=bl&ots=aWGERGC4hk&sig=ACfU3U1LAemZ4eNaIR-OM4JilVy4cHsQQg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi-jI7e39rqAhVNgnIEHe22DkAQ6AEwAnoECAcQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22anjana%20bai%20borkar%22%20%22Akku%20yadav%22&f=false Statik N (talk) 02:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On hold pending outcome of Wikipedia:Media copyright questions § Photos from BBC under WP:NFCI№ 8 on Akku Yadav. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 21:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Statik N: My reading of the consensus outcome of the above discussion is that only the infobox photo has a credible claim to passing the WP:NFCC. Please remove the other photos (they'll be automatically deleted by a bot if not being used in any articles). Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 00:05, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Psiĥedelisto: will it pass if i do? Statik N (talk) 00:46, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Statik N: Yes, I've reviewed everything else. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 01:03, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Psiĥedelisto: done Statik N (talk) 02:12, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review itself

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Passed. A well written, interesting article about a serial killer who corrupted several Indian police officers. I always love to see authors buck the WP:BIAS trends, and do so without sacrificing on article quality. See discussion above for what problems were solved during review process. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 02:40, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Some more work could be done in this regard, but Yadav was, per all the sources, a horrible person, and is long deceased, so it is not as critical as it would be in a WP:BLP.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: