Jump to content

Talk:Akio Kashiwagi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Akio Kashiwagi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revamped article

[edit]

See this revision.

I've placed a lot of inline citations, but they're not extraneous; Kashiwagi was secretive, so media reports are scarce; and as a casino customer, he was given full privacy, so quite a few of the reports are based on casino owners' words (mostly off-the-record). There's also a relative amount of telephone game and distortion, as outlets quote each other, with "according to X person" turning into "reportedly", and then turning into fact stated in the writer's voice. That's why there are so many inline citations: to easily see which news article supports which facts. Please don't try to group these citations together, or it'll just be harder to track down where each claim originated.

In places where news reports disagreed on numbers or facts, I picked what seemed like the most reliable claims. I would recommend against changing numbers and figures based on FUTON sources (like the Politico piece) unless you have access to all the other articles, and can make that same judgment for yourself!

Full disclosure, I used GPT-3 to help copyedit the draft, and, as an experiment, also let GPT-3 write the lead (which I reviewed and revised; I didn't keep it as-is). DFlhb (talk) 12:03, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]