Talk:Akhun Khel

Edit request from 119.153.213.230, 25 January 2011

{{edit semi-protected}}

119.153.213.230 (talk) 11:50, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[Spam removed]

Response to edit request

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. None of that can be added to the article, because you haven't given any reliable sources to confirm that it is accurate. Furthermore, we don't list family trees, detailed lists of all progeny, etc. Wikipedia is not a place to list all possible information about a subject--only that information that is encyclopedic. See WP:NOT for some policy details. If you have reliable sources for any of this, please make a new request with those sources and we can consider adding it. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:15, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's just a silly edit warrior trying to evade a block. Revert and ignore. -- œ ^™ 07:34, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again using socks trying to spam the same crap here, and here. -- œ ^™ 21:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Akhun Khel, C.C. Garbet, in his report published in District Gazetteer of Attock says that they are orignally Gujars and Awans. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.80.143 (talk) 09:55, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trimming of big addition

I've tried to trim down the very large addition into something more encyclopedic. We do not provide a list of descendants in great detail like that addition had. Instead, I've cut it down to just list each of the different clans/families described, though at times I had to guess at the meaning of the prior version. Technically, all of that information could be removed because none of it is verified by reliable sources; hopefully someone will provide some sources eventually. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:14, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's the same misguided user lacking competence that has been returning to this article for over a year now spamming the exact same thing over and over, also in multiple other articles, complete with his email address. Tried discussion.. either this person doesn't understand English or is purposely ignoring. Can't block as he's using multiple dynamic IP addresses and the ranges are too high for a rangeblock. Last protection was 3 months and he's back. I fear the only option left is to permanently protect this and his other targets. I already had to block Sayyid for a whole year and he just moved to the talk page with the same disruptive name-dropping. -- œ ^™ 15:29, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]