Talk:Aix-en-Provence possessions

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occult Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

'it is believed' or 'it was believed'?

In the section Diabolical Invasion we see the line "it is believed that he and Madeleine became lovers". This implies that this is a conclusion of a modern reader. Should it be "it was believed that he and Madeleine became lovers", meaning that people at the time believed this?--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 17:29, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

I removed a paragraph which was marginally relevant and poorly sourced. Sadly it was the only section with any citations to the referenced sources. Some footnotes would be helpful. Silver starfish (talk) 01:29, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gaufridy's Execution

The method of his combustion--dried twigs rather than logs--is misstated. As a person whose childhood home was heated by woodstoves, I can vouch for the fact that twigs do burn very fast and hot, but that logs would burn at an insignificantly cooler temperature and much slower, making the torment that much more vile. This error seems to begin with Jean Lorédan's overwhelmingly detailed account of the matter, Un grand procès de sorcellerie. --Graycard (talk) 21:04, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vérin

Who or what is Vérin, and are they related to Verrine (demon)? ZFT (talk) 04:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they're obviously the same figure. Demonology is full of slightly shifting spellings, such as Beleth also being spelled Byleth or Bilith, and ultimately being a corruption of Lilith. Ian.thomson (talk) 07:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"was possessed" is not a fact

Until demonic possessions are proved to exist and not just a belief, sentences such as "Sister Louise Capeau, was possessed until she died" do not make any sense. There should be a better formulation for this sentence. For instance "Sister Louise Capeau was believed to be possessed until she died" or something similar. --TheLazza (talk) 13:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]