Talk:Aitch

This page was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 6 February 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page of a disambiguation page, which is a non-article that lists actual articles with similar names. This page may not be frequently watched.

Consensus to endorse dab page

@DMacks, UnitedStatesian, Narky Blert, and Soumya-8974:

I noticed that Drmies kindly closed the Aitch RfD as "keep," due to a sockpuppet "trolling around." Keeping that result would mean we should be converting it back to a redirect to H. However, I Like the way the dab page shaped up thanks to @Narky Blert and DMacks:, so I thought I'd start a quick discussion to confirm whether or not everyone endorses the dab page. No rationale needed, per WP:NOTBURO; just !vote with either endorse dab page or convert back to redirect.

Cheers,
--Doug Mehus T·C 02:00, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever you say, Dmehus. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 02:09, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse, obvs. Narky Blert (talk) 05:27, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 11:20, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse per above, and because I think we have enough separate dab links to separate this from the H dab page. --Doug Mehus T·C 13:09, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse dab. Thanks all. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:00, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak endorse. The DAB page is viable, but it could either live here, or at Aitch (disambiguation) with the redirect retained as WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. DMacks (talk) 13:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe true, but I just think that if we have a viable, non-parenthetically qualified article name that's only being used as a little-used redirect, the dab page should be able to live there per WP:COMMONSENSE, WP:IAR, and any other applicable policies that would be better in substantiating the argument than a common sense/IAR endorse, potentially. Doug Mehus T·C 14:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]