Jump to content

Talk:Airstrike

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge with bomb

[edit]

I don't know who made the article, but it could use a lot of expanding. As for merging it, no. "Bombs" are frequeintly used in Airstrikes, and why anyone would merge them is beyond me. There are too many different listed uses and methods of airstrikes to merge it with anything. Colonel Marksman 20:54, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


This article is partially covered by both Aerial interdiction and Tactical bombing. But to keep the discussion centralised, please see Talk:Ground attack aircraft#Merge as there are a number of different overlapping articles to do with the use of aircraft in a tactical ground attack role. --Philip Baird Shearer 11:30, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Aside from the two I just added, this article does not have any references. I suggest people begin retracing their steps to add the appropriate refs to what already exists and that all new edits should try to cite their source(s).

JCPH 12:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quote:

"On November 1, the first ever aerial bomb was dropped on Turkish troops in Libya."

A year would be very helpful here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.57.177.113 (talk) 01:09, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Yes, you need a source to make a claim like that. It is my belief that the date is somewhere around 1912-1913, but I do not know who, what, where or exactly when. We'll have to remove this if no one can find a reliable source.


99.226.121.150 (talk) 23:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Er... I would think the first ever aerial bomb would refer to this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial_bombing_of_cities#Italian-Turkish_War_of_1911-1912 The actual "bombing" took place in 1911.


--Neilhalloran (talk) 00:42, 25 February 2010 (UTC) We are maintaining a database of reported airstrikes that affected civilians on the OurBombs.com website, here: Air Strike Tracker —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neilhalloran (talkcontribs) 00:41, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

[edit]

I think that it would be appropriate for this article to be merged with Close Air Support, and leave a disambiguation link for the other definitions of the word "Airstrike"(eg. Air Raid) Wiki flight simmer (talk) 14:23, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Wiki_flight_simmer[reply]

In my opinion, a merge would be useless and pointless. WinterSpw (talk) 00:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Airstrike vs. Air Strike

[edit]

The page is titled "Airstrike", but refers the words "Air Strike" appear multiple times during the article. Which spelling should be used? FrigidNinja (talk) 19:19, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


"Collateral damage can be advantageous"

[edit]

Am I being biased in thinking this is totally ridiculous? I wanted to remove it but I thought I would put the question here first. I suppose it can be 'advantageous' if you look at it from a sociopathic military perspective (not slamming military, I just believe ethic ought to have a part in military and this is counter to that), but that phrase seems outrageously spun to me.

Not Joey Clavette (talk) 03:07, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

[edit]

Please comment on the page move at Talk:Drone attacks in Pakistan. Uhlan talk 00:35, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Airstrike. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:20, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Airstrike. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]