Talk:Airport Central railway station/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 03:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- This is a great article; nice work! I have placed it one hold for now and left some comments below. Please ping me once you have addressed my concerns so that I can know when to reevaluate. Thanks! 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 03:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- @LunaEatsTuna: I've addressed everything. Steelkamp (talk) 06:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the fast response! I am now pleased to pass this article for GA status. Congrats! 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 06:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- @LunaEatsTuna: I've addressed everything. Steelkamp (talk) 06:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio check
[edit]Earwig says good to go. No concerns from me either. Quotations used in-line with WP:COPYQUOTE.
Files
[edit]All images are relevant, high quality and copyright-free:
File:Airport Central Station exterior, Western Australia, 11 October 2022 01.jpg
: CC-BY-SA 4.0, taken by nominator;File:Airport Central Station Skybridge exterior, Western Australia, 11 October 2022 07.jpg
: ibid;File:Airport Central Station Skybridge interior, Western Australia, 11 October 2022 03.jpg
: ibid;File:Airport Central Station, Western Australia, 11 October 2022 16.jpg
: ibid;File:Airport Central Station, Western Australia, 11 October 2022 28.jpg
: ibid;File:Airport Central Station Skybridge interior, Western Australia, 11 October 2022 11.jpg
: ibid;File:Airport Central railway station under construction, May 2020 04.jpg
: CC-BY-SA 4.0, uploaded to Commons by registered user;File:Airport Central Station, Western Australia, 11 October 2022 44.jpg
: CC-BY-SA 4.0, taken by nominator.
Cheers for all the images!
Prose
[edit]- "On the concourse are fare gates, toilets, and a staff office." – I may be being picky here, but this seems like an excessive amount of detail. I would assume all airport stations have these. Alternatively, perhaps it could be rephrased as "On the concourse are the fare gates and utilities." or something similar.
- Done.
- "There are also two emergency staircases at either end of the platform, and two emergency staircases from the concourse, which all lead to external ground level." – same concerns as above. The public links to the three levels seem notable to me, but mentioning all the emergency exists is fairly intricate detailing.
- I've removed that entire sentence.
- "and an original musical score." – do the sources say by whom?
- Unfortunately I could not find any information on this.
- That is indeed unfortunate.
- Unfortunately I could not find any information on this.
- "There is also artwork along the walls and travellators designed by Jade Dolman and Crispian Warrell of Nani Creative." – located throughout the station? Also:
- Clarified.
- Wikilink travellators
- Done.
- "The station's design was released on 28 May 2017." – elaborate; where/how was this released?
- It was released online and at a press conference I think. I don't think this is detail that is necessary.
- Fair enough; I agree.
- It was released online and at a press conference I think. I don't think this is detail that is necessary.
- "70% complete" – change to "70 percent complete" per WP:%.
- Done.
- "a division of the PTA." – I would unabbreviate PTA.
- Done.
- "The station is predicted to have average daily boardings of 6,100," – any updates since opening?
- No. There is no routine release of station patronage data so the only hope is that if patronage is particularly good, the government will release it to show off.
- I see!
- No. There is no routine release of station patronage data so the only hope is that if patronage is particularly good, the government will release it to show off.
Refs
[edit]All sources used are RS. Passes spotcheck—no concerns with refs 2, 7, 15, 16, 20, 31, 37, 40, 50 or 53. Nice work!
Other
[edit]Infobox, short description, WP:ALT text, navs, cats and other templates good.
- The amount of YouTube URLs in External links is quite excessive. At most I think only URLs 1, 3 and 4 could be kept if any.
- I've removed all the Youtube URLS except for the station animation.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.