Talk:Air transport in the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

A summary of this article appears in Transport in the United Kingdom.

Start

I have created this page in the hope of achieving an informative, balanced, reliably sourced and well cited article on the state of the air transport industry in the UK. At this moment it's a start that outlines what I understand to be the key issues, and goes into a certain amount of detail on some (but not all) of them. There is much work needed to make this a comprehensive and balanced treatment of the subject. --FactotEm 14:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Status - ~~Need to add detail on indirect economic impact (investment, growth sectors, business efficiency and economic growth, per OEF), balanced with counter arguments per FoE~~. --FactotEm 09:24, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FAC withdrawn

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Air transport in the United Kingdom/archive1 SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:57, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Subject matter and article rename

As a result of the unsuccessful FAC attempt I have copied this entire article to Future of air transport in the United Kingdom. The new article will deal specifically with Government policy contained in the Future of Air Transport White Paper. This article will be edited down to a stub intended to cover a more general appraisal of air transport in the UK, from historical beginnings to present day. --FactotEm 10:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion needed

OK. Probably a bit larger than your normal stub, but it lacks a significant amount of information relating to the history of air transport, including pioneering days of air transport, the age of the sea-plane, airport development, war years, the jet age, liberalisation of the markets, privatisations, concorde, airline development and more I'm sure. --FactotEm 12:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where does the 236 million passengers figure come from? Worldbank has a figure of only 145 million for 2016 https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IS.AIR.PSGR?year_low_desc=true --User:Kjwa —Preceding undated comment added 21:45, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

USA map

Why the need for the map? There are no maps for the ROW? Why is the US so important as a destination? (no intention to offend anyone, just puzzled)--Asterion^talk 22:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

doesn't work under linux firefox either -anon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.79.211.152 (talk) 01:57, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The place names don't even match up on the map, according to the map LAX is in central US. Also it doesn't even include all the destinations, for instance no Dallas. In short just get rid of the map. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt7272727272 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry Dallas is included but you can't see it. loads of place names go off the map! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt7272727272 (talk • contribs) 20:08, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gatwick

Gatwick Airport is not one of the top 10 busiest airports in the world. This should be deleted from the introduction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.9.184.44 (talk) 09:12, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 20 external links on Air transport in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]