Talk:Air superiority fighter
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Air superiority fighter article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Worldview
[edit]This article is rapidly developing a worldview problem, in that most examples given are US-based.
It would be nice if future editors could be mindful of this, broadening the scope to be more neutral.
Is the F-35 not an air superiority fighter?
[edit]In the list or active air superiority fighters, the LM F-35 is nowhere to be found, however, the F-35’s article says it is an American air superiority fighter. I don’t know anything about the subject, so I might be wrong in my understanding of the term. 89.8.36.118 (talk) 09:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Stop adding multirole fighters
[edit]There's a difference between an aircraft designed as an air superiority fighter that gained ground attack capability through upgrades, like the F-15A/B/C/D, Typhoon, and F-22, and a strike fighter or multirole fighter designed to be such from the beginning, like the F-15E, Rafale, and Su-57. There's a separate page for multirole fighters specifically for that category. 2600:8803:F50F:7E00:8128:85C4:84B1:A7F8 (talk) 23:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Is the kf 21 belongs to this list? 2A0D:6FC7:423:7473:5870:BD11:5D83:7381 (talk) 10:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)