Talk:Air pollution in Macau
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Air pollution in Macau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604132438/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=12&art_id=24573&sid=5239053&con_type=1&d_str=20051029&sear_year=2005 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=12&art_id=24573&sid=5239053&con_type=1&d_str=20051029&sear_year=2005
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:56, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Merger discussion
[edit]Wp:overlap If a page is very short and is unlikely to be expanded within a reasonable amount of time, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic. WP:SIZERULE It is obvious that this article is short. There are only four sources cited. One source is an archive, one source is a science paper that cannot be viewed easily, one source is an outdated link. This article is not even 30 kB. I suggest changing the name of "Air Pollution in Hong Kong" to "Air Pollution in Hong Kong and Macau" and merge this article into that article. Take a look at commons:Category:Fog in China, none of the media was taken in Macau. They were either taken in mainland China or Hong Kong. Tony85poon (talk) 20:27, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose They are 60 km apart. The nom argument is very poor. Two subjects. Johnbod (talk) 15:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)