Jump to content

Talk:Air Norway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAir Norway has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 5, 2010Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Air Norway/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Airplaneman ✈ 21:33, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    The prose is decent, and I made some minor fixes.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    All good here; references are present where they are needed. Checklinks is clear.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Great.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    checkY
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    checkY
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    checkY
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    This is definitely a Good Article. I cannot dispute the fact that the article is broad as well as focused in its coverage. The subject is represented free of bias and illustrated with pictures that are with the appropriate tags. Referencing is good as well. For further improvement, consider adding more content; the prose can always do with some improvement. See Biman Bangladesh Airlines for an airline Featured Article example. Congrats, Airplaneman ✈ 03:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fleet?

[edit]

I realized there aren't a section called "Fleet". Typically, an airline article should have such a section. Can anyone add them in? I'll try to find a reliable source to add the information. ThanksMaodi xn (talk) 11:11, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Maodi xn: It's been 8 years and since then, there is no fleet section. Iyusi766 (talk) 22:35, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Air Norway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Air Norway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Air Norway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:33, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Air_Norway&oldid=1204624991"