Talk:Air France Flight 066

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Accidents

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Is this correct info?

The lead says

 while flying over the Atlantic Ocean, west of Nuuk, Greenland.

I searched extensively trying to find a source that confirms Nuuk, but was unable to do so. Where did this info come from? The articles say over the Atlantic near Greenland or over Greenland; they differ but none says Nuuk. https://www.google.ca/search?q=flight+066+greenland&source=lnt&tbs=qdr:w&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjtlJvjstXWAhWs64MKHTLTBLgQpwUIIA&biw=1038&bih=492 Peter K Burian (talk) 21:31, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I finally found one that mentions Nuuk. https://avherald.com/h?article=4af15205 But most do not indiate that. Peter K Burian (talk) 21:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If "the failure occurred 150 km southwest of Paamiut, Greenland", can somebody explain why the article says that the incident happened over Greenland? That spot is over the Labrador Sea. Now, pieces of the aircraft's broken engine have apparently been found in Greenland. Did they fly 150 km or so before reaching the ground? There is something a bit wrong with all this. Kelisi (talk) 16:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Must have been over Greenland if this report is correct: Debris recovered in Greenland from Air France plane forced to land in Labrador http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/debris-recovered-from-air-france-plane-1.4346434 Peter K Burian (talk) 23:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Info

Why does all keep getting removed it does not matter if it says it twice, also take a look at the examples in the articles it clearly shows the same thing it says 0 deaths and all survivors. So how is it any different from here. And redundant excuse is getting old. RedProofHill123 (talk) 17:46, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We have been round this several times. There is no support for doing this and especially no support for removing "0" from the "| fatalities =" parameter. - Ahunt (talk) 19:24, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I does not matter anyways. RedProofHill123 (talk) 22:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also why can’t we have all? I probably understand why we can’t have all if it’s survivors 0 but not fatalities 0. Most articles include all so what your doing wrong. RedProofHill123 (talk) 22:32, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but your written grammar here is so poor that I can't understand your argument. Can you please try to explain your position more clearly? - Ahunt (talk) 14:23, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I’m trying to improve that. What I meant is that I might understand why we don’t include all when it’s survivors 0. But it’s more important to include it when fatalities 0 because people surviving is more important. RedProofHill123 (talk) 22:59, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I think I see what you mean. But in that instance if "fatalities=0" then it is pretty clear that everyone survived. - Ahunt (talk) 23:35, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In example of infobox page you will see all when it says fatalities 0 RedProofHill123 (talk) 01:06, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We have a consensus on that. If the documentation is out of date then it needs fixing. - Ahunt (talk) 02:03, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Andrewgprout, please do not get into such an edit war.

I have noticed that you are continuously reverting this edit over and over again. I do know that the title is Air France Flight 66 but, we are discussing about it in the talk page Avianca Flight 52. For now, let this be like this. After the discussion, if I lose, you may revert these edits, however, it is a correct edit which should be there in my opinion. Username006 (talk) 12:35, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]