Talk:AirTrain JFK/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AmericanAir88 (talk · contribs) 00:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good Day, It is a pleasure to meet you. I will take up this review. I hope we can get through this easy and stress free. AmericanAir88 (talk) 00:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Opening Comments

The way I do a good article review is similar to a trial. I put opening comments in and then have you speak. I address issues(if there are any) and give you plenty of time to fix them. From my first read through, this article is in very good shape. I found lots of information from it and it gives a great background on the Air Train JFK System. I we both can work together to get through this process easily. AmericanAir88 (talk) 00:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent Job on the "History" Section AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issues

@Epicgenius:

"It contains 10 stations serving six terminals as well as connections to the New York City Subway and Long Island Rail Road in Howard Beach and Jamaica. AirTrain JFK is operated by Bombardier Transportation under contract to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the operator of the airport. It runs a 24/7 service all year round."

This sentence uses the word "It" a lot. The word it is a very general term and the article would benefit from a more specific word. Also identify the location when you say "serving six terminals" AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. epicgenius (talk) 20:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The second paragraph in the intro contains multiple run-on sentences. AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. epicgenius (talk) 20:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"The All Terminals loop, an airport terminal circulator, serves the six terminal stations (Terminal 1, Terminals 2/3, Terminal 4, Terminal 5, Terminal 7, and Terminal 8). It operates in the opposite direction as the Howard Beach and Jamaica branches, making a continuous clockwise loop around the terminals. Connections to the Q3, Q10 and B15 local buses are available at Terminal 5."

Update with new information/expand(Theres no more Terminal 3) AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. epicgenius (talk) 20:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"During middays, trains come every 10 to 15 minutes, with 4 to 6 tph on each branch; during nights, trains come every 15 to 20 minutes, with 3 to 4 tph on each branch; and during weekends, trains come every 16 minutes, with 4 tph on each branch."

Run on Sentence AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. epicgenius (talk) 20:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"With the exception of Terminal 4, all AirTrain stations are outside the terminal buildings, sit on the other side of the terminal roadway from each building, and are connected to their respective stations through elevated walkways over the roadway. The actual Terminal 4 opened in 2013, after the AirTrain JFK opened."

Passage could use some reworking AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. epicgenius (talk) 20:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For the "Incidents" section, are shutdowns really counted as "Incidents". Please correct me if I am wrongAmericanAir88 (talk) 01:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed section. epicgenius (talk) 20:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The "Fulton History.com" references are broken AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:54, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I only found one broken reference. I've fixed that. The rest need a PDF viewer. epicgenius (talk) 20:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All issues have been solved, the review will now begin.

Review

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Grammar and spelling are clear and concise
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Compiles with the manual style.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	All information has references with credible sources
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	All information is referenced properly
	2c. it contains no original research.	All research has excellent usage of references with no original research
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	No violations have been found by the detector
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Goes above and beyond to provide all the information needed for the topic
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Stays on task while provides useful details
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	No bias words in the article
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No edit wars or conflicts found
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All images are tagged and are valid.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Images are extremely relevant are very related
	7. Overall assessment.

Closing Comments

Congratulations on passing the review. I found the article to be very enjoyable to read from its history section to its map system. You are a fantastic contributor to wikipedia. I hope to cross paths with you again whether it be in another review or working on articles. AmericanAir88 (talk) 20:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. And sorry for not being able to resolve the issues earlier. epicgenius (talk) 21:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, have a good day. AmericanAir88 (talk) 21:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.