Talk:Ahmadiyya by country
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Pakistan
[edit]User:Xtremedood - Firstly, I did not state that AJ was unreliable. Secondly, AJ is an Estimate. I was merely pointing out that in light of far more reliable sources, the Pakistani Ahmadiyya population is 2-5m. 0.6m figure, proportionally speaking is way out of range. Now if there was no availability of other reliable sources, AJ could well be useful in this case. Finally, AJ is only attempting to quote Ahmadi estimates, not independent estimates.--Peaceworld 22:16, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- 4,000,000 is one estimate. The maximum number given by an estimate should not only be there. The statistic should include a minimum to maximum figure. Xtremedood (talk) 23:24, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Xtremedood - It appears that you have totally ignored what I have said. Firstly 4m is not maximum. You are free to change it to the range 2-5m figure as in sources, although I personally prefer to write down an average or the most quoted figure in a variety of sources. Now let's come back to what I said earlier. The AJ source is quoting a figure described by Ahmadi leaders, and therefore is not an independent source. The said sources for the 2-5m make it clear that there are "more than two million followers of the Ahmadi faith in Pakistan." That is a contradiction to the source provided by AJ, which as a news source is less reliable. The figure 0.6m is too obscure, not to be supported by any other sources. Please take that on board when replying. Thanks. --Peaceworld 05:57, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- The following source [1] also gives 600,000 as a figure. They quote it from "Freedom House (2010), “The Impact of Blasphemy Laws on Human Rights.” 120". 4 million is a big gap and therefore the 600,000 figure should remain. Xtremedood (talk) 18:34, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Xtremedood - It appears that you have totally ignored what I have said. Firstly 4m is not maximum. You are free to change it to the range 2-5m figure as in sources, although I personally prefer to write down an average or the most quoted figure in a variety of sources. Now let's come back to what I said earlier. The AJ source is quoting a figure described by Ahmadi leaders, and therefore is not an independent source. The said sources for the 2-5m make it clear that there are "more than two million followers of the Ahmadi faith in Pakistan." That is a contradiction to the source provided by AJ, which as a news source is less reliable. The figure 0.6m is too obscure, not to be supported by any other sources. Please take that on board when replying. Thanks. --Peaceworld 05:57, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- I'll come back to discuss this later. It is still obscure. --Peaceworld 19:43, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- How is Freedom House obscure? Xtremedood (talk) 23:39, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
@Xtremedood: See this "Ahmadis have boycotted the census since 1974, rendering official numbers inaccurate." I'm not sure why you didn't look at the sources before reverting?--Peaceworld 16:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Legitimate source, should have been there in the first place. Xtremedood (talk) 16:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- It was there, as a tertiary.--Peaceworld 17:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
I may have messed up a reference
[edit]I apologies, I'm new, I think I replaced a dead link with a live one but I'm only 80% sure its the same information so I take responsibility if it turns out to be a mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:100:DC9C:9C1B:C77D:DEA8:309A ([[User talk:2601:602:100:DC9C:9C1B:C77D:DEA8:309A|talk]]) 22:03, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Stalker. See his threats at Talk:Dogon. He's now going through my recent edits reverting them. Doug Weller talk 07:13, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ahmadiyya by country. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rferl.org/content/kyrgyz_officials_reject_muslim_sect/24438562.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:09, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Ahmadiyya by country. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140502031906/http://www.newsfromafrica.org/newsfromafrica/articles/art_7902.html to http://www.newsfromafrica.org/newsfromafrica/articles/art_7902.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150130170337/http://www.israelandyou.com/kababir/ to http://www.israelandyou.com/kababir/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rferl.org/content/kyrgyz_officials_reject_muslim_sect/24438562.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 5 September 2022
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Belgium has a population of at least 2.000
Source article from HLN news: https://www.hln.be/affligem/bellekouter-decor-van-moslimcongres~a2b476b0/
The first line in the article says: "De Ahmadiyya moslimgemeenschap verwacht dit weekend meer dan tweeduizend gelovigen voor het religieus congres Jalsa Salana."
So there are even more than 2.000, but it's at least 2.000 for Belgium. A879r (talk) 07:35, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- Not done for now: We'll need an updated estimate/census of the Ahmadiyya population to reliably update this. Aaron Liu (talk) 11:46, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
"Ahmadiyya in Bosnia and Herzegovina" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ahmadiyya in Bosnia and Herzegovina and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 26#Ahmadiyya in Bosnia and Herzegovina until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 17:43, 26 November 2022 (UTC)