This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

=grammar

Untitled

I'm going to edit the grammar on this page. As it stands, the misconjugated verbs, run-on sentences and other grammatical mistakes make the page difficult to understand. 115.147.230.248 (talk) 13:54, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About the increasing guest cast listing

Don't you think it's inappropriate? I mean, will you include 100+ names if ever there was 1 guest cast or more in each of a hundred episodes (in case it will take that long)? It seems insignificant... Maybe including names who've appeared for 1 week. Well, just a thought.--JCD ^(Talk) 09:42, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the whole section should be removed, per other wiki articles on american/british tv series, which only include very notable guest appearances (in non-minor roles) of already-famous actors, worthy of their own wiki articles. after all, this is not imdb. Joanouvair (talk) 21:09, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

comments

You're removing citations and sad to say, your grammar is wrong. Maghanap ka nga ng source sa sinulat mo, adult themes pala ha at di pa sila adults.
Can you be more careful with your words?? Re-read what you write and you will realize.
Know how to properly cite. This is an encyclopedia and we want it look good.

hello. wikipedia is an English Language online encyclopedia, please write all comments in English, so that everyone can understand what you are writing. also, no personal comments WP:NPA about other editors are asked for in the space for summarizing your own edits -- very specifically: (Briefly describe the changes you have made). thank you. Joanouvair (talk) 19:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now, now mr/ms user those who visit the history page seems to know that those are by me. Now you should be able to tell that you're simply trying to make me look like an uneducated user with you re-posting those words. Well you've crossed my limits considering I've already posted that I apologize for that, (in which I don't know if you deleted or what). Don't try to be a wikipedia underdog just for those simple comments that might sound "insulting to you". ~~I've never mentioned a name on it~~ plus I briefly discussed what I did which you are telling I did not. So I violated wikipedia? What now, will I get sued because you told the whole world? Now you're the disrespectful one because you even brought it here instead on my talk page. I'm not thanking you with anything.JCD ^(Talk) 17:47, 23 April 2010 (UTC)--JCD ^(Talk) 00:53, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see I've specifically mentioned your name. Well it was to pin-point your "assumption" of an uncited edits plus it is disturbing to red. The "adult" part that is. Now don't blast me with your wiki policies because you simply got told to correct your mistakes.JCD ^(Talk) 18:05, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Enough of this nonsense.--JCD ^(Talk) 02:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it would be better if this entry is edited for the grammatical errors that make it really difficult to understand. Summertoes (talk) 16:45, 17 August 2010 (UTC)summertoes[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Agua Bendita. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110107121707/http://www.andieigenmann.net/ to http://www.andieigenmann.net

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:01, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]