Talk:Agro-terrorism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Agro-terrorism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Agriculture Mid‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Don't you think we should refrain from giving these people ideas?--Dudeman5685 07:22, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. As I see it, it's no different from describing the workings of an atomic bomb or giving a movie spoiler. This article is no more "giving people ideas" than the description of the hypothetical video game Body Harvest Moon. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 11:33, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is very poor logic to make the comparison between a real-world criminal act and the making of an atomic bomb, which, cannot be done by anyone except maybe a government or very well funded institution that would not get it "how to" from Wikipedia. In addition, it is also poor logic to compare real-world events with hypotheticals such as movies and video games. (Thinkforonce (talk) 16:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Wikipedia does not publish original research aka creates ideas, it republishes already existing terrorism ideas. It helps ordinary people to understand and accept governmental contra-measures better. It also reduces the psychological effect of terrorist acts, when people already know about the potential threats. In summary, republishing terrorism ideas on Wikipedia makes terrorism less effective.--Geysirhead (talk) 20:47, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fruitflies - dubious?

The release of fruitflies is marked "dubious - discuss", but there is no discussion. I'm removing the "dubious" tag and adding a cite needed in its place. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Agro-terrorism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]