Jump to content

Talk:Agitpop

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks for the definition of this musical term - it was most helpful in understanding where the band is coming from.

agitpop band or term?

[edit]

i was wondering why the photos were taken down? they are not copy protected. --Artclay 21:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the term needs to be seperated from the article on the band. --Artclay 21:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the term is now: Agit-Pop as it should be and the band now as Agitpop as it should be.

Artclay 15:51, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tone of article

[edit]

well dont know why anyone would be offended. if they read it they will know that the best of american politics were always involved with being independent of the mass, thinking for oneself, and enjoying life as a person and not as a willing cog. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.77.181.213 (talk) 13:12, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The tone of this article is still horrible and opinionated... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.60.21.223 (talk) 18:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


improper tone

[edit]

the sentence that might seem offensive has been changed. the tag was removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Artclay (talkcontribs) 10:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Such accusations are easy to make. For example: you are being offensive by not giving your argument for your accusations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Artclay (talkcontribs) 05:48, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Some adjustments made to the article. Trivia removed and references added.

COI NOTICE

[edit]
Wikipedia's Law of Unintended Consequences

If you write in Wikipedia about yourself, your group, your company, or your pet idea, once the article is created, you have no right to control its content, and no right to delete it outside our normal channels. Content is not deleted just because somebody doesn't like it. Any editor may add material to or remove material from the article within the terms of our content policies. If there is anything publicly available on a topic that you would not want included in an article, it will probably find its way there eventually. More than one user has created an article only to find himself presented in a poor light long-term by other editors. If you engage in an edit war in an attempt to obtain a version of your liking you may have your editing access removed, perhaps permanently.

In addition, if your article is found not to be worthy of inclusion in the first place, it will be deleted, as per our deletion policies. Therefore, don't create promotional or other articles lightly, especially on subjects you care about.


If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Agitpop, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you.Soundvisions1 (talk) 22:13, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Agitpop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]