Talk:Agha Shaukat Ali
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Removal of bogus material
[edit]Pl ref to my previous edits, on similar and linked pages- this article contains mostly false and bogus material and totally unreliable sources and I am going to edit it drastically and remove all these. Pl see my earlier comments thanks 39.54.204.165 (talk) 06:43, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Prof (r) Hilda Khan
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Agha Shaukat Ali. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150925132547/http://www.greaterkashmir.com/.../agha-shaukat-ali-passes-away/142937.html to http://www.greaterkashmir.com/.../agha-shaukat-ali-passes-away/142937.html
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150923194136/http://www.greaterkashmir.com/news/opinion/a-man-to.../143200.html to http://www.greaterkashmir.com/news/opinion/a-man-to.../143200.html
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20151102210004/https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid...id to https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid...id
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Clean-up reverted?
[edit]GorgeCustersSabre, You have reverted a large clean-up of the article (which doesn't seem to have any serious attention for a long time) with the cryptic edit summary it is correct
. What exactly is "correct"? What part of the clean-up are you objecting to? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC)