Talk:Aggression (poker)

This page was proposed for deletion by Chidgk1 (talk · contribs) on 14 October 2023.

Gambling: Poker Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Poker (assessed as Low-importance).

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Dispute

"In general, opponents must respond to aggressive play by playing more loosely" - huh? If I was playing tight, aggressive poker, I would love it if someone would respond by playing more loosely. Usually you need to tighten up and/or be more aggressive. If you're folding hand after hand on the flop to aggression, it's probably that you're playing too many hands to begin with. Playing looser isn't going to help you. Play tighter, then re-raise some of those continuation bets. Anyone have a strategy book handy to use as a source? Stevage 03:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

?

"being too predictable is far worse than being too passive"

? being passive means being predictable.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.178.252.63 (talk) 14:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]