Talk:Age of the Tempest

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finland Start‑class Low‑importance

	Finland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bump for the Blizzard Game?

Rather short article about a somewhat obscure Finnish game that seems rather un-notable. Should it be bumped out of the way for the Blizzard Entertainment game? Zero Serenity (talk) 19:56, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Either bump it, or else make Heroes of the Storm a disambiguation page, with the Finnish game renamed with (role-playing game). DarthBotto_talk•cont 20:04, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the name then put in the admin request to bump the Blizzard game to the front. Hopefully this is agreeable. Zero Serenity (talk) 20:24, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The role-playing game is an existing game with existing players. The other usage is yet another working title for a Blizzard game with no release date. It makes no sense to bump the Blizzard game, unless they actually release the game under that title. I propose either keeping the RPG bumped, or a disambiguation page. Petterkarlsson (talk) 11:48, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a Nordic role-player, I agree with the previous. This published and still-supported game is in the public consciousness and the Nordic roleplaying media. Olleolleolle (talk) 15:53, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The question is whether a primary topic can be associated with the title, and that is arguable. That there is an existing game with that title is not enough, even if it is well-known among a specific group of people, like Nordic role-players. If the game is hardly known outside that community, then Blizzard's game, even unreleased, may be more commonly known. I would be in favour of a disambiguation page instead.—Totie (talk) 15:36, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion closed. Disambiguation page it is. Zero Serenity (talk) 16:16, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Age of the Tempest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004222120/http://www.mindwarriorgames.com/heroes.html to http://www.mindwarriorgames.com/heroes.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:48, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]