Talk:Agardanda

India: Maharashtra / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

The Name

The article is written about the village, but the name says Agardanda "Beach" that make confusion whether the article is about a village or Beach. Can someone please put spotlight on this. I think the name should be Agardanda that I don't want to change without discussion. Cheers GSS (talk) 15:05, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 7 January 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure). sst ✈ 15:37, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agardanda Beach → Agardanda – article is about a village Vin09 (talk) 16:54, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about a village in Raigad district, Maharashtra but the name and the coordinates (18.165288°N 72.594023°E) pointing to the beach which creating confusion. So I think the name should be Agardanda and then we can change the coordinates to 18.2793111°N 72.9898068°E which pointing to the village situated on the beach. Agardanda Beach can be redirect to Agardanda later if needed. GSS (talk) 18:05, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support In ictu oculi (talk) 18:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.