Talk:Aftermath of the Polish–Soviet War

Military history: European / Polish / Russian & Soviet / World War II Redirect‑class

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Redirect

This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Polish military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

Russia: History / Military

	Russia portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
	This redirect is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This redirect is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Poland

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland

Text and/or other creative content from Aftermath of the Polish–Soviet War was copied or moved into Polish–Soviet War#Aftermath on August 2018. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

too many lulz

Someone needs to work on removing more lulz from the article and organizing it better. I've changed some stuff but right now it still looks like a piece written by a cold warrior/anti-communist crusader. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.246.121.195 (talk) 18:41, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong anti communist bias

A lot of these facts seem made up and POV. Any chanve this can be fixed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.11.73.175 (talk) 15:46, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aftermath of the Polish–Soviet War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311171937/http://www.rg-rb.de/2005/24/mir.shtml to http://www.rg-rb.de/2005/24/mir.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:07, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposal

I would like to propose that this article be merged into Polish-Soviet War. Polish-Soviet War article already has a more complete treatment of the topic, making this article somewhat redundant.