Jump to content

Talk:After the Bomb (game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New edition

[edit]

I have updated the After The Bomb entry to take into account the new edition. As the new edition no longer makes reference to TMNT (the backstory is completely changed, and TMNT is no longer in print), I have removed it, and expanded on the concept, making an overview of the background.

I would like to add further to this page, but I wonder how far it is customary to go when describing the game. Though everything I plan to say is in my own words, I worry that I come close to reproducing the entire setting... a big no-no, I think, but I'm not sure.

I'm going to check out other RPG pages to see how far they go.

Tarvok 21:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Uncited Sources Tag

[edit]

The list of supplements for the game serves as a list of sources for the article, as familiarity with the role-playing genre will bear out. It is sufficient for wikipedia's needs, unless you see some need to challenge the information therein. ---Mr. Nexx (talk) 04:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than just cut-n-paste my reply to multiple pages, I responded at Talk:Palladium Fantasy Role-Playing Game#Removal of Uncited Sources Tag so we can have one, centralized discussion on the issue. --Kralizec! (talk) 21:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Mutants Down Under

[edit]

Supplement that isn't independently notable and is just a stub Neonchameleon (talk) 22:42, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Mutants in Avalon

[edit]

Supplement that isn't seemingly notable in its own right and is just a stub Neonchameleon (talk) 22:43, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Mutants of the Yucatan

[edit]

Supplement that isn't seemingly notable in its own right and is just a stub Neonchameleon (talk) 22:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Road Hogs

[edit]

A supplement that doesn't seem independently notable - this one has primary sources Neonchameleon (talk) 23:56, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]