Talk:Afroyim v. Rusk/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 18:43, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Well done. Remove bold on case name in footnotes (an artifact of the citation template, beyond our control).

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Explain in background section that § 401(e) of the Nationality Act of 1940 removes citizenship by voting in a foreign election, and that this case challenged the constitutionality of that law.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   no edit wars.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Placing article on hold.

Good changes. Thank you for your prompt attention, and excellent work. Racepacket (talk) 20:11, 2 January 2011 (UTC)