Talk:African time

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 February 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Archives

1

Polychronic time in Africa?

The term "Africa(n) time" and all the negativity (or positivity?) about it conveys as much about the people saying it as about what they are referring to. It seems to deserve an article, but I'm surprised that the article does not consider polychronicity as a factor in African time references and systems. Couldn't part of the Western and Westernized exasperation with "African time" (or for that matter, attitudes that it's great to be laid back) have to do not with slowness, but with, perhaps, not understanding that the cultures may tend to be "polychronic"? That is considered in discussing "slower" time references in some other world regions.--A12n (talk) 21:22, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some info on this, as well as some other references. I think it is very important to see "African time" in a global context and not just as how African approaches to time might vary from Western ones. So a lot more could be done with this article and related ones.--A12n (talk) 08:30, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not just africa

While I object the "africa" reference, I object the deletion or at least this article can be integrated to other article that discuss similar concept. In other continent, such mentality about punctuality is also observed, such as among some southeast asian countries where I live. Indonesian call it, freely translated, "rubber time". I read also it happened too in certain Caribbean and Latin America regions. I agree with generalisation of the topic. Kembangraps (talk) 01:12, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Wikipedia should certainly address the racist term, given its currency, but we don't need two separate articles on the same idea.

Ngram shows that Colored People's Time shouldn't exist: "CP Time" is much more common and, all things considered, is probably the WP:COMMON WP:ENGLISH name (given that "African time" is also going to include "South African time" and generic descriptions of African history and people's "time in Africa). That said, scrolling through the Google Books search, "African time" really does seem to generally be a reference to this ethnic slur. I'm for merging the pages here, including CP Time in the lead as the American form, and addressing the rest in a #Name section. — $Llywelyn II$ 21:45, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At least one support was voiced in 2011 over at Talk:Colored People's Time. — $Llywelyn II$ 21:47, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also support, as they are the same underlying concept, and I placed the tag on both articles. But, a merge into a third page may work also. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 04:19, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The way this article and the CP time article is currently expressed, i don't think they're similar. it's more like CP time seems similar to the negative parts of African time (or polycronicity?), but has no parallel to the neutral or positive parts. this might be an argument against keeping the Name paragraph as it is, and against merge or making the expressions synonymous. Ingvald (talk) 23:38, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

'Within Britain, African time' / 'black people's time'

This sounds like racist assumptions / views embedded in an article as a vehicle for expressing personal prejudices. I was born and have lived in Britain for nearly 60 years and have never heard either of these expressions. I would expect them to have been used by the likes of Alf Garnett, and real-life versions of the same stereotype. But, 'black people's time'? Really? Where is the 'white people's time' article? 'Yellow people's time'? 'Light brown people's time'? These are views of a dying era. I am not against using such expressions with suitable expansion on the social context and views of the time, but to present them as fact rather than societal peculiarities is not sound. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.102.253 (talk) 22:10, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on African time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140202230844/http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/788640.shtml to http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/788640.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:08, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Going back to 'before the railways' in Europe was there a similar attitude towards time? 193.132.104.10 (talk) 15:39, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About this page

The concepts discussed on this page are actually fairly redundant, and boil down to "This concept exists in cultures independent of Africa" and "This page should be merged". And a bot message. That's why the discussions on this page should be merged into two sections. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 04:26, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]