Jump to content

Talk:Africa–China economic relations

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2013 white paper

[edit]

Yug (talk) 21:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TED

[edit]

New sections

[edit]

I was interested in greatly expanding this article by going into the relations between each country and China. I've already amassed 25 articles about China and Nigeria relations so I'd like to start there. When I'm finished can I add it to this article or link it in some way, which would be better? I'm looking for people to collaborate with so if anyone is interested get in touch with me and/or click on the google drive link on my talk page to see the collection of articles I have on this topic. Thanks Notgoingtotellyou (talk) 18:58, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rename/Delete pages? Africa-China economic relations vs Africa-China relations

[edit]

Can someone more clearly explain to me the difference between this page and Africa-China relations? The distinction is not clear by the titles. It seems that Africa-China relations, when compared to this article on "economic relations", only offers one new thing of value which is a more robust historical explanation of Chinese-African relations. If this is the case, Africa-China relations should be deleted. In any case, Africa-China economic relations is more organized, well-written, and has better sections when compared to Africa-China relations. Both articles have many issues with references... Anyway, any reason why the articles can't be merged? --Vivianliu94 (talk) 19:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded Bgrus22 (talk) 30 April 2019
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Africa–China economic relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Nguena's comment on this article

[edit]

Dr. Nguena has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:


Aspect on capital flight between Africa and China is missing (especially in section 8). I published a paper on this issue which may be usefull to update this interesting contribution.


We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

We believe Dr. Nguena has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:


  • Reference : NGUENA Christian-Lambert, 2014. "External Debt Origin, Capital Flight and Poverty Reduction in the Franc Zone: Does the Economic Consequences of Sino-African Relationship matter?," Working Papers 14/016, African Governance and Development Institute..

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 18:18, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Africa–China economic relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:29, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Africa–China economic relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Africa–China economic relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:16, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Macroeconomic and Political Strategy Opening

[edit]

Not to be rude but the line "has walked carefully and humbly towards Africa" without any context seems strange. While I do not necessarily disagree with this analysis it does not seem like a proper way to open a section. Bgrus22 (talk) 30 April 2019

Unreliable information.

[edit]

The following statements in the article are false.

In the diplomatic and economic rush into Africa, the United States, France, and the UK are China's main competitors. China surpassed the US in 2009 to become the largest trading partner of Africa. Bilateral trade agreements have been signed between China and 40 countries of the continent. In 2000, China Africa Trade amounted to $10 billion and by 2014, it had grown to $220 billion.[2]

The EU is China's biggest trade partner and China does not have bilateral FTAs with 40 African countries. See:

https://www.trademap.org/Bilateral_TS.aspx?nvpm=1%7c%7c14719%7c%7c7%7cTOTAL%7c%7c%7c2%7c1%7c1%7c1%7c2%7c1%7c1%7c1%7c1
and http://rtais.wto.org/UI/PublicSearchByMemberResult.aspx?MemberCode=156&lang=1&redirect=1 JAC Esquire (talk) 01:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
moreover, many sections are just plain text with no references Viooletta (talk) 12:31, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The first statement is not false. You are correct that the EU is China's biggest trading partner. But what this sentence is saying is that China is Africa's biggest trading partner. Those are not mutually exclusive.
Not sure about the bilateral trade agreements. Is the difference based on source date? JArthur1984 (talk) 12:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]