Jump to content

Talk:Aero Union

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

U.S. Forest Service airtanker scandal

[edit]

The section on the U.S. Forest Service airtanker scandal gives what might be a false impression. It says:

"...the USFS, organized a deal with the Department of Defense and the General Services Administration to exchange the grounded planes with more modern C-130a Hercules and P-3 Orion aircraft... Several of the planes ended up being operated for tasks outside of their intend firefighting duties. Some were used for cargo service, dismantled for parts or sold outright at considerable profit. Aero Union exchanged planes with the USFS, with the government retaining the titles and ownership, and was charged with maintaining and operating them for firefighting duties. Instead Aero Union dismantled the planes and sold the parts for a profit..."

However, the U.S. Forest Service airtanker scandal article says that Aero Union got six P-3s and no C-130s in the exchange program. Since Aero Union had seven operational P-3s at the time that their contract was cancelled in 2011, I doubt that they actually dismantled their six P-3s, at least not all of them.

Where's the evidence that they actually dismantled those six P-3s?

Also, the statements that several planes "ended up being operated for tasks outside of their intend[sic] firefighting duties" and that some "were used for cargo service" or "sold outright" seem out of place in this article, and potentially misleading, since I don't believe that any of the Aero Union planes are alleged to have fit those descriptions. That material is already covered in the U.S. Forest Service airtanker scandal article, anyhow, which seems to be where it belongs. Does anyone object to removing that from this article? NCdave (talk) 20:57, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the problem seems to be that the news report from the original article is a dead link and the court case in this article is not available on the internet anywhere. I was able to find a copy of the news report and the final line of it says "The supplemental suit accuses the agencies of quietly settling with Aero Union and TBM for illegally cannibalizing four of the planes placed in their hands for safekeeping and not sharing the $750,000 in proceeds." I've also seen some sketchy reports (from the Portland, Or. Free Press) stating that the government retook possession of the parted out planes only to sell them right back to to people that gutted them, in addition to a cache of extra parts to help repair them, for only a few hundred thousand dollars when the planes themselves were originally worth millions. So, while at least 4 planes were allegedly parted out by Aero Union and another firm they were also most likely repaired at some point. One of their P-3s was also destroyed in a crash back in '05 (sadly killing all three crew), so they have definitely acquired more planes outside of the tanker scandal thing. Sadly, most of these news reports are 15 years old or older and have long since dropped off their original publishers websites. I was only able to find these reports from a Google archive of a newsgroup discussion (from 1999) where the full article was reposted in violation of copyright law. How should we handle these missing sources? I rewrote some of the article to reflect this but left the citation needed tag in place. Lando242 (talk) 23:58, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aero Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:14, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aero Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:52, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aero Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:56, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Aero_Union&oldid=1204558513"