Talk:AeroXperience

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Microsoft

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Notability

This blog now complies with notability standards after having been referenced numerous times for various bits of news, especially the IE8 removal discovery which was referenced and linked by The Associated Press. Thus, I recreated a stub for the page. Atividia (talk) 05:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it meets notability standards. The top-70,000 thing is a bit of a reach, to say the least. The AP ref is good, but not enough by itself, and most of the other refs do not mention the subject directly. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Every single source I listed directly sources AeroXperience for the IE8 link, not including slashdot since those are still user-submitted. Atividia (talk) 05:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Check Technorati Authority for AeroXperience. They've got associations with Neowin, carry frequent linkbacks from ZDNet, and have been written up by the Associated Press at least once. I'm pretty sure based on those statistics that it qualifies for notability based on Notability. 98.211.102.127 (talk) 05:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you've convinced me, at least as far as a speedy-delete goes. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:14, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on AeroXperience. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:03, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on AeroXperience. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121109080956/http://vimeo.com/2157150 to http://www.vimeo.com/2157150
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090505155008/http://www.aeroxp.org/2009/03/ie8-functionally-removable/ to http://www.aeroxp.org/2009/03/ie8-functionally-removable/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090427150512/http://www.aeroxp.org/2009/01/lesson-on-infinite-loops/ to http://www.aeroxp.org/2009/01/lesson-on-infinite-loops/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090507162455/http://www.aeroxp.org/2009/04/the-ultimate-steal-no-really/ to http://www.aeroxp.org/2009/04/the-ultimate-steal-no-really/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090318013402/http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/04/5pillarspt1/ to http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/04/5pillarspt1/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090425113255/http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/12/q-a-with-amitabh-srivastava/ to http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/12/q-a-with-amitabh-srivastava/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090425233928/http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/09/windows-7-m3-hypothetical/ to http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/09/windows-7-m3-hypothetical/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aeroxp.org/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aeroxp.org/board/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]