Jump to content

Talk:Aeon Zen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First article

[edit]

Hello, This is my first article so I'm be greatful of some time and help from experienced users on this article please. I do welcome help please to tidy this artcle up. Thank you.
I read through the guidelines before writng this article and I was confident that they have met the criteria.
1. Aeon Zen have recorded with existing Wikipedia vocalists/band existing entries in this music genre.
2. They have with their recent officially released album achieved national and international success. ( Registered with PPL/MCPS statutory royalty bodies in the UK)
To support this the following are extracts from both UK and US magazines and also webzines.

[redact - extensive use of quotes as possible copyright violations]

  • Classic Rock Presents Prog magazine. [1]
  • Progression Magazine [2]
  • www.rockarea.eu [3]
  • www.perfectprog.com [4]
  • www.seaoftranquility.org [5]


Thank you

--15:18, 16 September 2009 (UTC)Musictada (talk)

Why is this article contested? GryphonGuitar (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ UK Issue 3 of Classic Rock Magazine Future Publishing Ltd
  2. ^ US Magazine issue 57. P.O. Box 7164 Lowell, MA 01852 U.S.A
  3. ^ http://www.rockarea.eu
  4. ^ http://www.perfectprog.com
  5. ^ http://www.seaoftranquility.org

Notability tag removal (2009-09-19)

[edit]

This is an archival copy of a message that I posted on the talk page of the tagger (Rd232) [1]

Hi,

I see that you added the notability tag to Aeon Zen. I propose to remove that tag as per the criteria at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28music%29 which are fulfilled.

Firstly, the notability guidelines state that to be notable an artist must fulfill "any one of the following criteria" (my italics).

The article in question fulfills criterion 1: "Has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable".

The subnote to this guideline reads: "This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries" and, in this case, none of the exemptions apply.

The published sources in question (which are listed in the article) are:

"Aeon Zen, A Mind's Portrait". Classic Rock Presents Prog (Future Publishing). July 2009

and

"Aeon Zen, A Mind's Portrait". Progression Magazine. Spring/Summer 2009. http://www.progressionmag.com/.

which are both print magazines with ISSN/barcode numbers.

I will post a further copy of this message on the talk page ([2]) for future reference. If you dispute this, please leave a message on the talk page, or on my talk page telling me where I've gone wrong.

Many thanks.

Historyofmadness (talk) 08:23, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, I have now added the ISBN correction:ISSN numbers to make this verifiable and added an additional print source: Powerplay Magazine: Short Cuts, August 2009, ISSN 1474-287X Historyofmadness (talk) 08:51, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aeon Zen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]