Talk:Aeolic order

"Fungitecture™" [sic]

The following external link has been inserted here and at various other articles: www.fungitecture.com A sense of what's up with this ican be had from the following introductory statement: "The term Fungitecture was coined to describe the peculiar resemblance between certain ancient styles of monumental architecture and the fruit of one or other species of fungus. However, Fungitecture also serves as an umbrella term covering a much wider field of human endeavour, wherever fungus imagery, lore or substance may have been invoked." There are no references to any responsible peer-reviewed literature, needless to say. This does not show Wikipedia in a flattering light, in my opinion. -Wetman (talk) 01:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wetman's incompetent reference to link corrected. O8TY (talk) 14:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The name "Fungitecture" is a trademark and must be recognised as such. O8TY (talk) 10:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also response here. [O8TY:Talk] O8TY (talk) 05:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very poor article (definition, evolution, dates, area, description)

@Warofdreams, Torquatus, Johnbod, and Demetrios1993: hi. This article is stuck. If you can add to it, or if you can call on editors interested in the general topic of ancient building styles that you came across while editing, please do so.

We need a completely reworked, well-structured article. This one is almost useless. It has a good starting point, but nobody picked it up to bring it to a useful, expanded form. Here is a suggestion for a structured article:

What: definition (what, where, when, by whom, relation to other orders)
Name (etymology)
Evolution
Description
Where: geographical area where it was found
When: dates (centuries) when they appear and are replaced by other orders, by geographical area
"See also": what's not already mentioned in "Evolution" and elsewhere - related orders/styles, relevant cultures and regions, etc.

What I want to take away once I've read it: it's an "order", so what elements does it consist of? How do I recognise an Aeolic column base, column, capital,...? What is the relationship to the Proto-Aelolic capitals of the Southern Levant, if any? This is dealt with by Shiloh (old theories) and widely expanded on since (latest find of numerous capitals, in south Jerusalem, early 7th c. BCE, published just yesterday). How does it fit in with other palm-tree (palmetta) decorations throughout the Ancient Near East and Egypt? Possible evolution from wooden columns. Concrete question: are palm-tree-decorated capitals from 9th-7th c. BCE Southern Levant (Israel & Jordan), and separately from Cyprus, Egypt, Tunisia, other parts of the MENA and Sicily, a different animal altogether?

As it is now, the article is dominated by the image of a Tunisian artifact, which I'm not at all sure that it's covered by the definition, and by text relating to the Proto-Aelolic capitals, described by Shiloh as much earlier than, and not part of the order. I finish reading the article and I'm more confused than informed. Sorry for putting it across like this, real life is calling, I won't be able to contribute much for now, but I needed some info and didn't find it here, and you happen to be the main contributors so far to this budding article. Thanks and have a great day, Arminden (talk) 06:44, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How to change Google search illustration?

@Doug Weller, Zero0000, and Debresser: hi, sorry to bother. If one googles for Aeolic order, the Ionic (!) capital image, which used to be at the top of this article, springs up. How can that be modified? The Tunisian example might not even correspond 100% to the definition, but at least it looks Aeolic (vertical palm-tree decoration), which of course cannot be said about the Ionic example (hanging, horizontal fronds). I've moved the Tunisian photo to the top of the article, but Google didn't react. Who knows what to do? Thanks, Arminden (talk) 08:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no idea. Perhaps a matter giving it some of time? You could ask perhaps at the Wikipedia:Teahouse or Wikipedia:Village pump. Debresser (talk) 11:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Google moves in mysterious ways, but I think all Wikipedia pages have dropped down a bit. Doug Weller talk 17:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've redone the pics - I think maybe the aspect ratio of the only other pic was rejected by google (rather understandably). For now they still show the old pic though. Johnbod (talk) 12:39, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]