Talk:Adventure Time season 2/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khanassassin (talk · contribs) 17:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, yo, yo, it's ya'boy Khanassassin again, ready for anotha review! --Khanassassin ☪ 17:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)--Khanassassin ☪ 17:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

If I'm correct, "second season" shouldn't be bold; I noticed you did the same at the season one article. Has the rule changed?
Hmm, I'm not sure. I've always done this. I might need to check.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't it be "the American animated television series" (same at season one)? That's how I do it.
Fixed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"The episode 'It Came from the Nightosphere' was even nominated for a..." Isn't the even a bit POV-ish?
Removed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Development

Concept

Completely fine, but isn't it somewhat worth mentioning that it's not just the season that follows these two guys on their adventures, because currently it sounds like this is season two-exclusive, if you know what I mean.
I was trying to make reference to the fact that Finn is 13 in the season, but you're right. Changed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh! Well, that actually makes sense. You can change it back, if you feel it would work better. --Khanassassin ☪ 13:25, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Production

"After the series debuted on April 5, 2010, with "Slumber Party Panic", the series was quickly renewed for a second season of 26 eleven minute segments." Could you change "the series" (first time) to Adventure Time? I think it would read slightly better.
Good catch.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Around August 2010, the writing for the second season was finished, and the production staff even had received bits of animation from the show's overseas animation staff." Can you drop the "even"?
Fixed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"...the episode was not quite finished." I'm probably wrong, but the "quite" sound just a bit unencyclopedic to me...
Fixed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cast

It's fine.

Reception

Ratings

It's fine.

Reviews and accolades

And again, it's fine.

Home media

Fine, but the first two mentions of "region" are non-caps, like they should be, while the third isn't. And you should link the first "region 1" too.
Fixed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes

All cool.

Nice article, Just a Lil Bit of more work needed. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 18:01, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Except for the first one, I have fixed all the issues. Let me check that one out.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I'm pretty sure it should be non-bold, so I'm de-bolding it for now. If you happen to find out that it should be bold it, then just re-bold it. The rest of the issues have been taken care of, so congrats! I give this article_{of a notoriously overrated show (sorry)}a Pass! :) --Khanassassin ☪ 13:25, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]