Talk:Adventure Time/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khanassassin (talk · contribs) 19:25, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Once again: Khanassassin! --Khanassassin ☪ 19:25, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

Remove the "[citation needed]" in the last paragraph, since that bit of info is sourced later in the article. Otherwise, a'right, a'right.
Good catch. Someone keeps adding it in there, even though, as you mentioned, its in the main body.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Development

Concept and creation

Nice, nice.

Production

Great!

Cast

Again; nice, nice.

Setting

Ah, you know!

Title sequence and music

Characters

I haven't looked through this section yet, but this is like 40% of the article and it's well-sourced, so couldn't it be moved to List of Adventure Time characters?
See below.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes

The section's fine, but this is just a personal preference; since there's a link to the full episode list, the overview table could link to the seasons' own pages. The "Pilot" is already linked in the article, and it's listed in the table as a "Season", which it's not, so you could remove it. If you feel that the pilot episode should be mentioned in the section, you could maybe add it in the paragraph below the table..?
I linked the seasons, as that makes a lot of sense. I kept the pilot, however, because the graph/table is shared with the List of Adventure Time episodes page, and the pilot is really a separate entity, as its the same show in name, but was released at a completely different time and by a different network.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

Ratings

All cool.

Reviews

Yep, you know what.

"What Was Missing" controversy

The "somewhat controversial" bit is kind of POV-ish, but otherwise, nice.
Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Awards and nominations

Nice, nice.

Other media

Toys and clothing

Cool.

Comic books

Coool.

Video games

Cooool.

Home media

All cool.

References

Fine, except that the two Twitter links (#17, #18) are dead.
Fixed. I fixed a couple more that I found, too.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You did one hell of a job with the article! Again, there's Just a Lil Bit of work left. Very little. :) -Khanassassin ☪ 20:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! And huge thanks for reviewing this one! I believe I have fixed or addressed all the concerns.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

i also agree on splitting the character list. Id be bold about it, but probably need consensus first.Lucia Black (talk) 20:57, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Let's be bold about this. Who should stay, and who should go?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Probably none, i think a summary of the characters in general would work well. Mention the plot focuses on Finn and Jake and recurring characters such as Princess Bubblegum, Ice King, Marceline and maybe Flame princess.Lucia Black (talk) 21:05, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Lucia. That sentence, plus a link to the character page, and bam! That's it. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 21:10, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me.Lucia Black (talk) 21:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How does it look now? Here's the new article.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:23, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Once again, I'm giving this article_{of a notoriously overrated show (sorry)}a Pass! :) --Khanassassin ☪ 16:03, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]