Talk:Adventure (Television album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Alternative music

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Punk music (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punk music, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Punk musicWikipedia:WikiProject Punk musicTemplate:WikiProject Punk musicPunk music articles

Protopunk v. Postpunk

Yes, punk is supposed to have started in 1977, making this album after punk... except that punk continued on for years. Television doesn't have much in common with the postpunk movement, which didn't really start until 1979 at least. I still think the band album should be listed as protopunk, due to their detachment yet contribution to punk. Folkor 16:12, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Punk didn't start in 1977 at all. Take a look at the Dictators,Ramones,Dead Boys all considerably active before 1977. Anyway Television was in the 'punk scene' as it were despite there music differing from well let's just say the ramones. I think proto-punk would be alright as well as any others you deem needed as you can use multiple genres.Case 21:02, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite correct. I just wanted to point out that even if punk had already started by 1978, the album could still be protopunk, as it could influence later punk. Also, it really is a bit too early to truly fit into postpunk... although it could. I just don't think so. I'm going to revert the postpunk back to protopunk, as I think that is more accurate. Folkor 22:35, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is encyclopedia consistency. The article on protopunk describes the genre's practitioners as such: Most protopunkers are Rock and Roll performers of the 1960s and early-1970s, though some earlier performers have been cited...Significant examples include Iggy Pop (Commonly nicknamed "The Grandfather of Punk" and claimed as influential by many early punk artists) and his band The Stooges, Alice Cooper, Pere Ubu, The MC5, The Velvet Underground, The Modern Lovers, T. Rex, and the New York Dolls. It would confuse the issue to call Television (a noted and seminal punk act) proto-punk, because proto-punk bands were, above all, _not punk rock bands_. Furthermore, it is silly to suggest that merely being influential on later punk-rock constitutes being "proto-punk", as even the likes of Green Day have influenced later groups identifying themselves as punk. Your revert stems, I suppose, from a literal parsing of the word 'protopunk', but demonstrates a misunderstanding of what the word actually denotes.--70.48.205.197 15:46, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that makes sense. But the album isn't post-punk, either. I was hoping there was a better genre for them to fit into than just punk, but if that's the only thing that fits, so be it. Folkor 16:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed! (Although the page on postpunk cites Marquee Moon, the citation is kind of weak.) --70.50.76.196 21:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Adventurealbumcover.jpg

Image:Adventurealbumcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]