Talk:Advance Wars: Dual Strike/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I'll be reviewing this for GA-status; I should have the review up soon. Cheers! —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 03:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• Are semi-colons really needed in the lead?

• That's the way the formatting is done in Advance Wars: Days of Ruin, which served as the template for this article. Changed to commas anyway. NOCTURNENOIR ^{( t • c )} 04:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

• Can we get reference(s) for the first para of "Gameplay"? (or are those not required for these sections in VG GA's?)

• Done. NOCTURNENOIR ^{( t • c )} 04:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

• This should be easy to fix (or it may not need fixing lol), but I will but it on hold. Cheers! —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 03:22, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Passed. Good job! —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 04:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)