Talk:Adult service provider

Merge

I added a section in Sex Industry. Considering the destination articles are lacking cited references it seems dubious that we would spend a great deal of time debating where to merge this article stub that lacks them as well. Alan.ca 12:56, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sex worker

Recent verbiage notwithstanding, this remains a synonym for Sex worker. One redirect has already been reverted (without an Edit Summary or reason stated in this Talk page). – edgarde 05:25, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, Adult service provider can refer to a company that provides services, adult sex worker is clearly an individual SCubed 08:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken. Wouldn't such companies go under Sex industry? It's not necessary (or a good idea) to node every piece of jargon with redundant articles. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. – edgarde 12:18, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sex industry

Either this should be a simple redirect to Sex industry, or a disambig for Sex industry and Sex worker. I'm guessing the redirect will be sufficient. edgarde 12:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge and redirect to either sex industry or sex worker, no preference, but agree this is not a sufficiently different or common term to be a standalone article. AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 14:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]