Talk:Adriana Paz/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 04:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 04:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's not much wrong with the article. I've copyedited a little, mostly to introduce paragraph breaks to improve reading flow.

Hilda was distributed in Mexico by Cinépolis seems an odd this to mention; we don't talk about distributors for any other film. I'd cut this unless it's important for some reason.

Fixed. I will add that fact in the Hilda article. Javier Espinoza (talk) 08:34, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You don't give a date for when Paz joined Dios, Inc.

I do not have the exact date, I only have the date for the first airing. Javier Espinoza (talk) 08:34, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When she joined Vis a vis did she quit Dios, Inc.?

She only joined Dios, Inc for a guest performance. I added a ref for that. Javier Espinoza (talk) 08:34, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have some dead links; see here.

I can't judge the quality or reliability of the sources, as they're mostly in Spanish, but I don't see any obvious problems. Other than the dead links, these are all minor points. I'll revisit the review once these points are addressed. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Christie: Hi, I wanted to know if you could check the article again? I made some fixes based on your recomendations. Thank you. Javier Espinoza (talk) 09:17, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The points above look fine now. I just noticed that you are citing a blog: this one. Why would we regard this as a reliable source? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:33, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was hard to find references about that part of the actress career. In Mexico we do not have much press dedicated to film criticism or film investigation, and this is a good interview with her, so that is why I felt it was a good source. Javier Espinoza (talk) 22:18, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the difficulty, but we do have to be sure the source is reliable. Has the blog been cited (not necessarily for this posting) by other news organizations? Is the blog author a respected journalist in movie criticism? Is there anything else we could use to demonstrate it's reliable? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 00:18, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The author is a fellow Mexican actor, Ivan Cortés, he has been nominated for an Ariel Award (Mexican equivalent to the American Oscar), it is all that I could find. Javier Espinoza (talk) 20:22, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that's enough, I'm afraid, unless you can show the blog is cited by reliable sources. I think you need to remove the reference and the material it supports. You could try asking at WP:RSN if you think there might be a consensus that this is reliable, but without some more evidence I can't pass GA with this included. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Christie: Fixed. Thank you. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Footnote 12 doesn't need an access date because there's no URL, so you can remove that. That's a minor point, though; everything else looks good so I'm passing this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:55, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]