Jump to content

Talk:Adolfo Camarillo High School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Camarillo high school students' Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores have ranked consistently among the highest in Ventura County. Test scores indicate that Camarillo's students also continue to rank well above the state and national averages.

Sources? May violate NPOV; is completely unsourced, and may be factually inaccurate as of 2006. DolphinCompSci 02:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with DolphinCompSci, this research has not been sourced. Furthermore, judging by the amount of vandalism this page has received recently, I have flagged it with NPOV. Shanew2 20:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cam high logo.jpg

[edit]

Image:Cam high logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:26, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Usa chant

[edit]

This was a single event. Once. Coverage although widespread, did not last but a few days. Fails NOTNEWS by a mile. John from Idegon (talk) 06:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention that without any other history here, it creates a WEIGHT situation in this article. John from Idegon (talk) 06:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree that it should be removed entirely. The event itself received significant coverage in a multitude of reliable sources. I think we can compromise on whittling down the language, but wholesale removal IMHO is wrong. As such I will revert the removal per WP:BRD.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:13, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. The content has been out of the article for 9 MONTHS. And you replace it unilaterally, without addressing my prime arguement at all??? Frankly, that's a crock of crap. I'm removing it again. You have a burden to show it meets NOTNEWS, which is a policy, not a guideline. Don't put it back without a concensus, for which you will need to show widespread coverage over time if you expect me to make any compromise on inclusion. Further, without other history, including anything on this is a further crock. For 57 years, nothing happened, one night some kids decided to be dumbasses, and the dumbasses in the media got all huffy about it and the universe was created. Get real. Even if somehow this was good content, which I am in no way conceding, it's got a bit of a pov slant to it. Sounds like whomever wrote it somehow thinks the poor children that were suspended were somehow wronged. John from Idegon (talk) 06:43, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, no, you removed it unilaterally here. And as there is no time limit, I reverted your bold removal, it is you who reverted a reversion. See WP:BURDEN. I have met my burden by verifying with reliable sources that the content is accurate compared to the reliable sources provided to place it on the content. There is no consensus for removing well sourced content. That IMHO can be considered vandalism.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 07:57, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:NOBLANKING.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 07:30, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RightCowLeftCoast asked me to take a look at this discussion. My reaction is that this was a passing news story, not of lasting or encyclopedic importance. All of the references are from that one week. My advice would be to leave it out. If people can find any sources from (for instance) 6 months later showing that this was still a thing, I could change my mind. --MelanieN (talk) 00:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, MelanieN. I find controversy sections to be magnets for bad content. I would not object to a sentence about this (with sourcing showing some longer term coverage), in the context of a broader history section. John from Idegon (talk) 00:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rival

[edit]

The traditional rival is Rio Mesa. They are no longer in the same league but have agreed to an annual out of league game to continue the rivalry. As I understand it, Newbury Park is the rival in the new league but I am still researching this relationship. Fettlemap (talk) 16:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rival as in "designated" rival by organizers seeking to name an in-league rival. The Rio Mesa rivalry stems from a longer standing situation where both schools draw from the city of Camarillo. Families interact and shop at the same stores. With the geographical separation caused by the Conejo Grade, its not the same between the East Camarillo area and the Newbury Park western portion of Thousand Oaks. Its only a 5 minute drive, but virtually no pre-sophomore aged student would ever ride their bicycle up that hill. Newbury Park might be the closest school to Camarillo in the same league, but do not have nearly the same social interaction. Trackinfo (talk) 17:29, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You guys are way over complicating this. It doesn't matter where people shop it doesn't matter what league what school is in. It's really very simple. If you can reference a newspaper story saying something to the effect "Foo HS played its rival Boo HS Friday night...", you can list a team as a rival. If you can't, you can't. This is an encyclopedia. We report on what others have written. Nothing else. John from Idegon (talk) 18:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adolfo Camarillo High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Adolfo_Camarillo_High_School&oldid=1198041084"