Talk:Adolf Galland/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 14:35, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]- some disamb links need looking at Arthur Harris,Blenheim,Buer,German occupation of Luxembourg,Glider,Karl Koller,Ripcord,Spanish,Staffel,Tarnow,Wing Commander Done
- Reference 141 what makes this a reliable site http://www.ww2awards.com/person/215 Done
- Same question reference 10 & 77 http://www.luftwaffe.cz/gallanda.html
- Usually this webiste is very reliable as a dedicated source. Dapi89 (talk) 15:20, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Same with reference 19 http://www.elknet.pl/acestory/gallan/gallan.htm Done
- refs 3 aand 6 appear to be the same and the year of publication needs completing Done
- reference ranges need looking at refs 32 and 33 for example we have Baker 1996, pp. 68—69 with a long dash and Baker 1996, pp. 70-72. with a short one Done
- The two Galland books are not secondary sources in connection to himself if used in connection to another matter i.e specifications on an aircraft that would be another matter
- Can you clarify: can I not use him to state his personal view on the Bf 109F for example? Dapi89 (talk) 15:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yes but in quotes Done
- Can you clarify: can I not use him to state his personal view on the Bf 109F for example? Dapi89 (talk) 15:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Some of the images need full names and linked for persons in them Göring and Mölder Done
- 'Wilhelm-Ferdinand, a 54 victory ace, was shot down on 17 August 1943.' - do we know what happened to his as its cut off rather abruptly Done
- In the Pilot training section Weimar Republic could be linked Done
- All the pilots, and Adolf - no need for and Adolf as all the pilots accepted the invatation Done
- In the into the Luftwaffe section Hermann Göring needs linking at first use Done
- he believed Göring to be competent leader of the new German air arm - to be a competent leader Done
- German contingent won their neighbours' respect - Germany does not have a boundery with Italy can this be reworded Done
- Major Rheital was rumoured to have suffered courts martial, but the investigators dropped the charges - rumoured to be courts martialed Done
- Galland flew his first combat in Spain - Galland flew his first combat mission in Spain Done
- he was replaced by the younger Werner Mölders - is the age difference important ? Done
- In the Staff post in the RLM section that kind of coordination possible - that kind of coordination was possible Done
- Equipped with the Henschel Hs 123, a "biplane Stuka" - do you mean a biplane dive bomber ? Done
- On 11 September Adolf Hitler arrived at LG 2 headquarters and had lunch with the staff. Hitler had been on one of his visits to the front line - On 11 September Adolf Hitler arrived at LG 2 headquarters and had lunch with the staff, during one of his visits to the front line Done
- If your bringing this is - Galland had to sneak away to fly combat missions using various tricks and ruses - can you supply an example
- I don't have one, the source doesn't give any. Dapi89 (talk) 17:49, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- recognised ace (a pilot with five or more aerial victories) needs a cite Done
- During these sorties Galland learned tactics which Mölders used - During these sorties Galland learned the tactics which Mölders used Done
- Galland gained further experience as a combat leader by relieving Gruppenkommandeur as they went on leave - does not make sense should it be relieving the Gruppenkommandeur (not sure what or who they are) Done
- Galland scored his first aerial victories - Galland claimed his first aerial victories Done
- These aircraft were of No 87. Squadron RAF, who lost two aircraft. - Both aircraft were from No 87. Squadron RAF Done
- link bombers from Nos. 15 and 107 Squadron Done
- They landed not far from a German-held airfield and had to push their Bf 109s up a hill to glide down to the airfield of Charleville-Mézières in the valley below - does this mean they landed and got out and pushed them up the hill ? if so how then did they take and glide down Done
- Galland expressed a high opinion of RAF pilots from that point on - needs a cite Done
- This does not make sense if they were already in the Pas de Calais - From June 1940 on, Galland flew as a Gruppenkommandeur (Group Commander) of III./Jagdgeschwader 26 (JG 26), fighting in the Battle of Britain with Messerschmitt Bf 109 "Emils" from bases in the Pas de Calais. On 19 July 1940, Galland was promoted to Major and JG 26 moved to the Pas de Calais Done
- As the battles over the Channel continued, Galland scored victories on 25 July and 28 July, both Spitfires. - Galland shot down a Spitfire on the 25 and 26 July Done
- As the battles over the Channel continued, Galland scored victories on 25 July and 28 July, both Spitfires. - needs a cite Done
- In the Channel front section duplication of - By the end of 1940 Galland had 57 victories. says the same at the end of the previous section Done
- Promoted to Oberstleutnant, he continued to lead JG 26 through 1941 against RAF fighter sweeps across northern Europe.- needs a cite Done
- Sgt H Whewell and Sgt R.G.V Barraclough - Sergeant H Whewell and Sergeant R.G.V Barraclough Done
- Same with other rankls F/L and P/O Flight Lieutenant and Pilot Officer on first use linked and the full form after Done
- Wing Commander of the Northolt Polish Wing - this wing must be numbered can it be linked Done
- Short sentances - Galland bailed out. As he was falling he tugged at what he thought was his parachute ripcord. - Galland bailed out and tugged at what he thought was his parachute ripcord. Done
- Same with "It opened." a two word sentance needs incorporating into the rest of the text Done
- A Spitfire of the bomber escort (probably from the Polish No. 308 Squadron RAF) managed to hit Galland's fighter with a 20 mm shell - Galland's fighter was hit by a 20 mm round from one of the bombers fighter escorts. Done
- Galland suffered a head wound and landed at base, where he was hospitalised for the second time in a few days. - Wounded in the head he managed to land and was again hospitalised Done
- Galland had been "shot up" twice and shot down twice (twice in one day) in the space of four weeks - Galland had been shot up and shot down twice in the space of four days - gets rid of the twice twice twice Done
- succeeding renowned pilot - is POV succeeding Werner Mölders who had just died Done
- The German warships Scharnhorst, Gneisenau and Prinz Eugen sailed from their port at Brest, France and through the English Channel, despite the Royal Navy's supremacy at sea. - sailed from Brest France up the English Channel (to where ?), despite the attention of the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force. Done
- Some clarification and citation needed tags have been added and I have tightened up the prose some. Done
I will put the article onhold allowing you time to work onit.--Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:29, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- I think I've done all that was requested and a tad more on top. I thought about adding a picture in the return to Germany section (the aircraft he bought on his 50th). Not sure though. Dapi89 (talk) 19:30, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- I believe the aces of the Luftwaffe web site is unreliable being a privately run site. Its only being used twice both times backed up by a book reference so I would delete it unless you can provide details of why its reliable.--Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Done
- Passed GA --Jim Sweeney (talk) 08
- 42, 14 October 2010 (UTC)